General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
November 15, 2018

EIOPA published a peer review report assessing how national competent authorities supervise and determine whether an insurer's setting of key functions fulfills the legal requirements of Solvency II, with an emphasis on proportionality. The report includes findings from a comparative analysis of the key functions, identifies best practices and, presents an overview of recommended actions addressed to the national competent authorities and EIOPA.

The peer review examines the practices regarding the following:

  • Combining key functions under one holder
  • Combining key functions with administrative, management, or supervisory body (AMSB) membership or with carrying out operational tasks
  • Subordination of one key function under another key function
  • Split of one key function among several holders
  • Assessment of the fitness of key function holders
  • Outsourcing of key functions

The review finds that the national competent authorities have adopted similar approaches in assessing how insurers manage key functions and applied the principle of proportionality in their assessment. Four best practices have been identified, providing guidance to the national competent authorities for a more systematic approach on the principle of proportionality and ensuring consistent and effective supervisory approaches. Additionally, the report identifies certain weaknesses and presents the resulting recommendations for the national competent authorities. It was found that certain national competent authorities had not yet assessed key functions according to the Solvency II requirements. Other national competent authorities had weaknesses regarding the depth assessment and mitigating measures demanded from insurers—for example, in cases where combinations exist.

The areas of recommended actions have been linked with the supervisory approach of national competent authorities, the different combinations of key function holders including the internal audit function and AMSB membership, and the fitness of the key function holders and outsourcing. Consequent to this peer review, many national competent authorities have already undertaken actions to improve supervisory practices. These improvements will be taken into consideration in the follow-up to this review. The period examined under the scope of this peer review was 2016 but also covered supervisory practices executed before 2016 in the preparatory stage of Solvency II. The peer review was conducted among national competent authorities from the European Economic Area on the basis of the EIOPA Methodology for conducting Peer Reviews.


Related Links

Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Peer Review, Supervisory Practices, Proportionality, EIOPA

Related Insights
News

US Agencies Propose Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure Framework

US Agencies (OCC, FED, and FDIC) proposed to implement a new approach for calculating the exposure amount of derivative contracts under the regulatory capital rule.

December 17, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Announces Intention to Consult on Updated BCBS Disclosure Rules

HKMA announced that it will consult the industry in due course on the relevant implementation proposal to give effect to the disclosure requirements of the December 2018 package by BCBS.

December 17, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Issues and Revises Reporting Forms Under the IRRBB Framework

HKMA issued a revised version of the Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) IR-1, with an updated title “Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book” (IRRBB).

December 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for December 2018

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

December 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Proposes Changes to Guideline on Large Exposure Limits

OSFI proposed revisions to the Guideline B-2 on Large Exposure Limits, for implementation in the first quarter of 2020.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Consults on Disclosure Rules for Leverage Ratio Window-Dressing

BCBS published a consultative document on revisions to the leverage ratio disclosure requirements to address the leverage ratio window-dressing behavior.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Updates the Policy on Approach to Systemic Risk Buffer

PRA published the final Statement of Policy on the PRA approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer (SRB), as proposed in the consultation paper CP29/18.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EP Report Examines Financial Supervision and Regulation in US

European Parliament published a report that provides a concise overview of the Dodd-Frank Act, the challenges of its implementation, and efforts to roll back the Act, in large part due to what are viewed to be vague and impractical provisions.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Proposes to Revise Several Reporting Forms Including FR Y-9C

FED proposed to extend for three years, with revision, the FR Y-9, FR Y-7N, FR Y-11, and FR 2314 family of reports, in addition to the forms FR 2886b, FR Y-8, FR 2248, FR 2320, FR 2644, and FR 2886b.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines on the STS Criteria in Securitization

EBA published the final guidelines that provide a harmonized interpretation of the criteria for a securitization to be eligible as simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) on a cross-sectoral basis throughout EU.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2340