US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a joint statement encouraging banks to prepare for the use of alternative reference rates for their lending activities. The agencies reiterate that they are not endorsing a specific replacement rate for the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for loans. For its loans, a bank may use any reference rate that it determines to be appropriate for its funding model and customer needs. However, the bank should include fallback language in its lending contracts to provide for the use of a robust fallback rate if the initial reference rate is discontinued.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its preferred alternative for both cash and derivative transactions. The use of SOFR, however, is voluntary. Examiners will not criticize banks solely for using a reference rate other than the SOFR for loans. The agencies encourage banks to
- determine appropriate reference rates for lending activities and begin transitioning loans away from LIBOR without delay.
- accelerate outreach to lending customers to ensure that they are aware of, and prepared for, the transition from LIBOR.
- consider any technical changes that might be required for internal systems to accommodate new reference rates or fallback rates.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, LIBOR, Fallback Language, SOFR, Alternative Reference Rate Committee, Benchmark Reforms, US Agencies
Previous ArticleHKMA Consults on Implementation of Final Basel III Reform Package
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.