BCBS Report Examines Progress in Implementation of Basel III Reforms
BCBS published a report updating G20 leaders on the progress toward implementation of Basel III regulatory reforms in the 27 Basel Committee member jurisdictions. The report summarizes the outcomes of the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP) of BCBS and provides an update on Basel-Framework-related measures taken by members in response to COVID-19 crisis. The RCAP monitors the progress of members toward adoption of Basel III standards, assesses the consistency of domestic banking regulations with Basel III standards, and analyzes the prudential outcomes of these regulations. The report contains Annexes that summarize the adoption status and implementation consistency of Basel standards. BCBS also announced that it now intends to complete the outstanding implementation assessments of net stable funding ratio and large exposures framework by the end of 2022, instead of the earlier planned timeframe of 2021.
The report highlights that, since last year, further progress has been made toward the implementation of Basel III standards in a full, timely, and consistent manner. Banks have continued to build capital and liquidity buffers while reducing their leverage. Prior to the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, large internationally active banks had made further progress toward meeting the fully phased-in final Basel III capital requirements and their liquidity ratios remained stable, compared with end of 2018. More recent data, which incorporate the impact of COVID-19 crisis, suggest that capital and liquidity ratios of banks have generally remained stable. The Basel III standards for capital, liquidity, and global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) have generally been transposed into domestic regulations within the timeframe set by the Basel Committee. The key components, including the risk-based capital standards and the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), are now enforced by all member jurisdictions.
Additionally, most of the member jurisdictions have final rules in place for other Basel III standards, including those related to the net stable funding ratio (NSFR), the leverage ratio, the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR), and the supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures. However, the final rules for some standards have not yet come into force in some jurisdictions and many jurisdictions have faced delays in implementing certain standards based on the agreed timelines. To date, 10 jurisdictions have been assessed and found to be “compliant” with NSFR and large exposures standards. BCBS had initially planned to complete a review of the implementation of the NSFR and the large exposures framework for all member jurisdictions in 2021. However, in March 2020, it agreed to postpone all outstanding jurisdictional assessments planned in 2020, under the RCAP, to commit all the resources that are required to address the implications of COVID-19 crisis. BCBS has been gradually mapping out a return to resume the jurisdictional assessments, with a view to completing the outstanding implementation assessments of NSFR and large exposures framework by the end of 2022 and preparing the implementation assessments of the final Basel III reforms.
As of the end of 2019, all internationally active banks continue to meet the fully phased-in risk-based minimum capital requirement and the target common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital requirements. In addition, BCBS is taking forward the evaluation of its Basel III reforms that have been implemented to date. The evaluation will examine the extent to which Basel III standards have achieved their intended objectives and will incorporate lessons learned from the COVID-19 crisis. BCBS further notes that most Basel-framework-related measures taken by its members in response to the COVID-19 crisis have been capital or liquidity-related, with the primary objective of supporting banks' ability to continue lending and providing liquidity to the real economy. Most measures make use of the flexibility embedded in the Basel framework, with many other measures taken over and above this flexibility being temporary in nature.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel, RCAP, G20, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, Regulatory Reforms, BCBS
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
EIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee MeasuresRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.