ECB Sets Deadline for Banks to Meet Its Climate Risk Expectations
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks. ECB is now setting staggered deadlines for banks to progressively meet all the supervisory expectations laid out in its guide on climate-related and environmental risks in 2020. ECB also published a compendium of good practices observed in some banks, which demonstrate that swift progress is possible and are aimed to facilitate the improvement of practices across the sector. ECB has also set institution-specific deadlines for achieving full alignment with its expectations by the end of 2024.
The thematic review of the strategies and governance and risk management frameworks covered 107 significant banks under the direct supervision of ECB and 79 less significant banks supervised by their national authorities. ECB conducted this thematic review alongside its supervisory stress test on climate-related risks. In addition, a targeted review of commercial real estate drilled down into climate-related risks in commercial real estate portfolios. In 2022, ECB also checked banks’ management of climate-related and environmental risks through on-site inspections. It also completed a gap analysis of banks’ disclosures of climate-related and environmental risks. The thematic review aimed to check whether banks adequately identify and manage climate risks as well as environmental risks such as biodiversity loss. It also delved into banks’ risk strategies and their governance and risk management processes. The review concluded that, even if 85% of banks now have in place at least basic practices in most areas, they are still lacking more sophisticated methodologies and granular information on climate and environmental risks. There is also supervisory concern related to the execution capabilities of most banks, where effective implementation of their practices is still lagging behind. As a result, banks continue to significantly underestimate the breadth and magnitude of such risks, and almost all banks (96%) have blind spots in identifying them.
The report on good practices follows on from the thematic review of ECB and outlines a set of 26 good practices originating from a range of institutions across various business models and sizes to meet the supervisory expectations set out in the 2020 ECB guide. The report covers observed practices related to strategy-setting, governance, risk appetite, and risk management. ECB also emphasizes the evolving nature of good practices and expects these to mature over time. This report should be read in conjunction with the ECB Guide and the prudential requirements set out in the regulatory framework and, more particularly, the Capital Requirements Regulation Directive, as further specified in the European Banking Authority guidelines.
ECB also outlined the key timelines and steps for banks to achieve full alignment with its expectations by the end of 2024:
- In a first step, ECB expects banks to adequately categorize climate and environmental risks and to conduct a full assessment of their impact on the bank activities by March 2023 at the latest.
- In a second step, and at the latest by the end of 2023, ECB expects banks to include climate and environmental risks in their governance, strategy and risk management. Some banks have already started to plan for the transition to a low-carbon economy and to engage with their clients. However, a wait-and-see approach still prevails in most banks. For example, banks do not set interim targets or limits to their risk-taking with a view to fulfilling their long-term strategic commitments, or set them in such a way that the immediate impact on the bank’s business is negligible.
- In a final step, by the end of 2024, banks are expected to meet all remaining supervisory expectations on climate and environmental risks outlined in 2020, including full integration in the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and stress testing.
The deadlines will be closely monitored and, if necessary, enforcement action will be taken. Supervisors are already including bank-specific climate and environmental findings in the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). ECB has imposed binding qualitative requirements on more than 30 banks in its annual SREP. Moreover, for a small number of banks, the outcome of the 2022 supervisory exercises on climate and environmental risks had an impact on their SREP scores. These, in turn, impact their Pillar 2 capital requirements.
Related Links
- ECB Press Release
- Good Practices for Climate Risk Management (PDF)
- Results of Thematic Review on Climate Risk (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Stress Testing, SREP, Basel, Pillar 2, CRR, ICAAP, ECB
Featured Experts
James Partridge
Credit analytics expert helping clients understand, develop, and implement credit models for origination, monitoring, and regulatory reporting.
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Laurent Birade
Advises U.S. and Canadian financial institutions on risk and finance integration, CCAR/DFAST stress testing, IFRS9 and CECL credit loss reserving, and credit risk practices.
Previous Article
BCB Examines Stability of Financial Sector, Issues Other UpdatesRelated Articles
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
BIS Bulletin Examines Cognitive Limits of Large Language Models
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
ECB is Conducting First Cyber Risk Stress Test for Banks
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
EBA Continues Momentum Toward Strengthening Prudential Rules for Banks
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
EU and UK Agencies Issue Updates on Final Basel III Rules
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards