IFSB published answers to the selected frequently asked questions (FAQs) on four IFSB standards and guidelines. The standards and guidelines include guiding principles on Sharīʻah governance systems for Institutions offering Islamic Financial Services, or IIFS (IFSB-10), standard on solvency requirements for Takāful undertakings (IFSB-11), revised capital adequacy standard for IIFS (IFSB-15), and guidance note on quantitative measures for liquidity risk management in IIFS (GN-6); these standards and guidelines were published in December 2009, December 2010, December 2013, and April 2015, respectively. IFSB welcomes feedback for improvement of the FAQs, which provide additional clarifications on the standards.
FAQs on IFSB-10. IFSB-10 provides guidance on the principles of Sharīʻah governance systems. Therefore, the FAQs for IFSB-10 address key questions on how the Sharīʿahgovernance systems can complement the existing governance, control, and compliance functions within an IIFS. The responses also clarify suitable Sharīʻah governance structure to be adopted by IIFS in various jurisdictions.
FAQs on IFSB-11. These FAQs highlight key questions on overview of the standard and valuation of technical provisions. The FAQs also attempt to address the distinguishing factors between takāful undertakings and conventional insurance for solvency requirements.
FAQs on IFSB-15. The FAQ responses for IFSB-15 seek to clarify the qualifying criteria to be included in capital components of an IIFS. The FAQs also explain the definitions for different kinds of regulatory adjustments, for example, the treatments of pension funds, cash-flow hedge reserve, and zakāh obligations, among others. Examples of computation of risk-weighted assets for IFSB standard formula as well as supervisor discretion formula are illustrated in the FAQ answers.
FAQs on GN-6. The main objective of the GN-6 is to provide guidance of maintaining liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) by the IIFS. Therefore, the FAQs on this guidance note elaborate related issues on the eligibility criteria and other specific details on the eligibility criteria of Sharīʻah-compliant high-quality liquid assets as well as calculation methodologies. The FAQ responses also clarify the treatment of profit-sharing investment account for LCR purposes to determine appropriate run-off factors under different scenarios.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, IFSB-10, IFSB-11, IFSB-15, GN-6, Solvency Requirements, Capital Adequacy, Liquidity Risk, IIFS, IFSB
Previous ArticleFASB Issues Summary of Tentative Board Decisions at August Meeting
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.