FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The note also presents an overview of payment deferral programs and their accounting treatment, before moving on to discuss the associated practical considerations related to these payment deferrals. While analyzing the financial stability implications of implementation of these programs by the prudential regulators, FSI emphasizes the importance of timely classification and measurement of credit risk by banks.
The note highlights that prudential authorities are caught "between a rock and a hard place" as they encourage banks—through various relief measures—to provide credit to solvent, but cash-strapped borrowers, while keeping in mind the longer-term implications of these measures for the health of banks and national banking systems. In navigating these tensions, banks and supervisors face a daunting task as borrowers that may be granted payment holidays have varying risk profiles. Distinguishing between illiquid and insolvent borrowers—amid an uncertain outlook—should help guide banks' efforts to support viable borrowers, while preserving the integrity of their reported financial metrics.
IFRS 9 allows banks to recognize interest income on these missed payments, raising prospective risks if borrowers are ultimately unable to repay. In addition, if the payment moratorium is lengthy, the deferred interest payments that are added to a borrower’s loan balance and the corresponding amount that are recognized in banks’ interest income accounts will increase, accentuating medium-term risks for borrowers and banks. The extent to which these risks materialize and how they affect the accounting classification and measurement of loans, depends on two factors: first is the ability of borrowers to repay the debt once the deferral period ends and second is the availability of collateral support, including the existence of public guarantees that back the underlying exposures.
The note concludes that payment deferral programs provide an indispensable lifeline to consumers and businesses affected by COVID-19, but they could also increase future risks to the banking system. Therefore, their design will be critical in balancing the short-term needs of borrowers with longer-term financial stability considerations. The financial stability implications of payment deferral programs will be driven by the extent to which borrowers will be able and willing to repay their debt obligations once the payment holidays expire, particularly in the absence of a public guarantee. The cumulative impact of COVID-19 and payment deferral programs on bank balance sheets depends on many factors and will only become apparent over time. Therefore, the timely classification and measurement of credit risk is critical for banks to provide confidence to supervisors and their stakeholders on their financial health. Delaying loss recognition until the tide goes out may leave banks and supervisors with fewer options for dealing with the repercussions.
Keywords: International, Banking, Loan Moratorium, Loan Guarantee, Credit Risk, IFRS 9, Accounting, COVID-19, Financial Stability, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleESMA Updates Q&A on Securitization Regulation in May 2020
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is seeking comments, until October 21, 2022, on the introduction of CPS 230, which is the new cross-industry prudential standard on operational risk management.