DNB updated the overview of recurrent and one-off data requests to banks from both DNB and EU institutions. It also updated the additional data-quality checks for reporting by banks. From this reference period, the new Data Point Model (DPM) 3.0 will apply. Most of the reporting forms within this DPM contain 4 digits in DPM 3.0 instead of 3. The data quality checks have been adjusted to this and to the changes in content. In addition, the non-XBRL checks whose source designation was EBA in previous publications have been clarified in this publication by presenting the relevant EBA ID number in the column "source."
DNB also updated the list of additional data requests for banks. The update in this version relates to the information on EBA Risk Assessment Questionnaire that is intended for selected significant institutions. The questionnaire covers bank opinion regarding the main risks and vulnerabilities in the banking sector in EU and is part of the EBA semi-annual Risk Assessment Questionnaires exercise among banks and market analysts. The updated requests have been highlighted with the word "UPDATE” in red and include semi-recurring data requests to banks from DNB and European agencies. The list does not include all regular reports based on existing European and national legislation, regular data requests referred to in the Statements Regulation under the Financial Supervision Act (Wft), data requests to individual banks, data requests relating to individually mentioned counterparties, and other requests for data such as surveys and qualitative questionnaires. DNB removes a one-off data request from this list every three months after the date indicated in the column “deadline banks.”
- News on Data Quality Checks
- Additional Data Quality Checks (XLSX)
- Update on Additional Data Requests
- Additional Data Requests (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, Netherlands, Banking, Reporting, Data Quality Checks, XBRL, Data Point Model, DPM 3.0, DNB
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.