As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy has come to a sudden halt. This is likely to bring about high levels of nonperforming loans. High levels of such loans are problematic because they impair bank balance sheets, depress credit growth, and delay economic recovery. The article highlights that designing effective nonperforming loan resolution policies for the post-COVID-19 world is a key forward-looking financial policy issue for Europe.
In this article, the authors use a new database covering nonperforming loans in 88 banking crises since 1990 to find out the lessons learned. The authors use the “local projections” method to assess the link between nonperforming loan resolution and post-crisis output dynamics, while controlling for their co-dependence. The data show that dealing with nonperforming loans is critical to economic recovery, as high and unresolved nonperforming loans are associated with deeper recessions and slower recoveries. The results of the analysis highlight forces that can make nonperforming loan resolution after the COVID-19 events different from that after the 2008-2012 crisis. Compared with the 2008 crisis, some factors are conducive to nonperforming loan resolution this time: banks have higher capital, the forward-looking IFRS 9 accounting standards can help in recognition of nonperforming loans, and the COVID-19 crisis was not preceded by a credit boom. However, other factors that could make resolution of nonperforming loans more challenging are substantially higher government debt, lower bank profitability, and weaker corporate balance sheets.
If the economic downturn proves temporary, many post-COVID-19 nonperforming loans may relate to viable illiquid firms, rather than unviable zombie firms. In contrast, if the economic recovery from the pandemic is slow and protracted, credit losses from corporate distress will rise and could overwhelm banks, further complicating nonperforming loan resolution. Thus, the analysis concludes that, given the importance of nonperforming loan reduction for economic recovery and many countries’ historical difficulties in implementing effective measures related to nonperforming loans, designing effective nonperforming loan resolution policies for the post-COVID-19 world is a key forward-looking financial policy issue for Europe today.
Related Link: Article on COVID-19 and NPLs
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Credit Risk, NPLs, IFRS 9, COVID-19, NPL Resolution, ECB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleEBA on Extending Large Exposure Limits for French Systemic Banks
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.