Featured Product

    FSB to Evaluate Effects of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms for Systemic Banks

    May 23, 2019

    FSB is seeking feedback as part of its evaluation of the effects of the too-big-to-fail reforms for banks. To this end, FSB published a reference document, known as summary terms of reference, which details the objectives, scope, and process of the evaluation of too-big-to-fail reforms. Feedback, including evidence in support of the responses, should be submitted by June 21, 2019. FSB will consider the feedback it receives while preparing its draft report, which will be issued for public consultation in June 2020. The evaluation will be completed once final report is published by the end of 2020.

    The evaluation, which is being conducted by a working group chaired by Claudia Buch (Vice-President of Deutsche Bundesbank), will assess whether the implemented reforms are reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with the systemically important banks. It will also examine the broader effects of the reforms to address too-big-to-fail (for systemically important banks) on the overall functioning of the financial system. FSB is inviting feedback from banks, other financial institutions, academics, think tanks, industry, and consumer associations on the following issues:

    • To what extent are too-big-to-fail reforms achieving their objectives, as described in the terms of reference? Are they reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important banks?
    • Which types of too-big-to-fail policies (for example: higher loss absorbency, total loss-absorbing capacity, more intensive supervision, resolution and resolvability) have had an impact on systemically important banks and how? 
    • Is there any evidence that the effects of these reforms differ by type of bank (for example: global vs. domestic systemically important banks)?
    • What have been the broader effects of these reforms on financial system resilience and structure, the functioning of financial markets, the global financial integration, or the cost and availability of financing?
    • Have there been any material unintended consequences from the implementation of these reforms to date?
    • Any other issues related to the effects of too-big-to-fail reforms that have not been covered in the questions above.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: June 21, 2019

    Keywords: International, Banking, Too-Big-To-Fail, Systemic Risk, TLAC, Resolution, Crisis Management, FSB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    PRA Guides Further on Treatment of Payment Deferrals in CRR and IFRS 9

    PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter from Sam Woods, its Deputy Governor and CEO, to update the March guidance on treatment of COVID-19-related payment deferrals under IFRS 9 and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    June 04, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Announces Additional Relief Measures Amid COVID Crisis

    MAS, along with the Ministry of Finance (MOF), the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), and the Enterprise Singapore (ESG), announced a package of measures to support those that may face cash-flow constraints.

    June 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Consults on Guidelines for Cloud Outsourcing

    ESMA published a consultation paper on guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.

    June 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA to Release Data for 2020 Spring Transparency Exercise Next Week

    EBA announced that it will release the bank-by-bank data of the Spring 2020 EU-wide transparency exercise on Monday, June 8.

    June 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Statement on Use of E-Signatures to Submit Regulatory Forms

    PRA issued a statement confirming that firms may use electronic signatures for submission of forms and other regulatory documents, although in specific instances PRA may request a "wet signature" where it is appropriate to do so.

    June 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA to Require Additional Reporting and Disclosures for COVID Measures

    EBA published the guidelines and templates for reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures applied in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

    June 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Guidance Confirms Support for Mortgage Customers Amid Crisis

    FCA updated its guidance confirming the support firms should give to mortgage customers that are either coming to the end of a payment holiday or are yet to request one.

    June 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Temporarily Amend Supplementary Leverage Ratio Calculation

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published an interim final rule that temporarily revises the supplementary leverage ratio calculation for depository institutions.

    June 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA FAQ for Standard on Margins for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives

    APRA published a frequently asked question (FAQ) providing guidance to all APRA-regulated entities in determining their requirements under the prudential standard CPS 226 on margins and risk mitigation for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    June 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Revised Standards for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities

    EBA published a consultation paper on the draft amended regulatory technical standards on own funds and eligible liabilities.

    May 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5253