ECB published a working paper that analyzes the cross-border propagation of prudential regulation in the euro area. The study measures cross-border externalities of prudential regulation using the euro-area bank-level data. The data showed that domestic banks reduce lending after the tightening of capital requirements in other countries, while they increase lending when loan-to-value (LTV) limits or reserve requirements are tightened abroad. Additionally, foreign affiliates increase lending following the tightening of sector-specific capital buffers in the countries where their parent banks reside, with bank size and liquidity playing a role in determining the magnitude of cross-border spillovers.
The study used a panel of 248 euro area banks and found evidence for inward cross-border spillovers from capital regulation (capital requirements and sector-specific capital buffers), liquidity measures (reserve requirements), and borrower-based measures (LTV limits), along the two channels of transmission. For the first channel, via changes of lending by domestic banks in reaction to changes in the prudential policy abroad, it was found that euro-area domestic banks reduce, on average, lending following the exposure-weighted tightening of capital requirements in foreign EU countries. The paper also reveals that domestic banks increase their lending when facing tightened LTV limits or reserve requirements abroad. For the second channel, which operates via changes in lending of foreign affiliates, it was found that foreign subsidiaries and branches increase lending when sector-specific capital buffers, LTV limits, and local reserve requirements are tightened in the home countries where their parents reside.
These findings speak for leakages from these instruments, which operates via foreign affiliates. Taken together, these findings suggest that the sign of cross-border spillovers, that is, whether the tightening of the instrument abroad/in the home country leads to an increase or decrease in bank lending is instrument-specific. It appears that instruments directed toward specific borrowers/sectors, such as LTV limits or sector-specific capital buffers, or acting locally, such as reserve requirements, are prone to negative cross-border spillovers, while tightening of tools which act at the consolidated level, such as capital requirements, exerts positive spillovers—that is, it leads to a decrease in lending also abroad. It is also found that bank characteristics play a role in the propagation of cross-border spillovers for the first channel. In particular, the paper notes that euro-area domestic banks that are less liquid reduce their lending more when the exposure-weighted capital requirements are tightened. Tighter LTV limits abroad are likely to lead larger euro-area banks (as measured by total assets) to increase lending more than other banks.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Systemic Risk, Capital Requirements, LTV, Capital Buffers, Cross-Border Spillovers, Research, ECB
Previous ArticleSEC Proposes to Improve Cross-Border Application of SBS Requirements
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.