HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong. The report is based on an industry-wide survey conducted by the HKMA Market Research Division, which aims to assess the current status of fintech adoption in the banking industry in Hong Kong and understand views of banks on the prospect of fintech development in the next ten years. The survey results indicate that fintech is viewed as a complement and enabling technology by the Hong Kong banking industry.
The report highlights that fintech innovations have been applied widely across all financial services by incumbent banks. The incumbent banks have made tangible efforts to apply financial technologies and intend to apply them to a greater extent in the future. Overall, the incumbents view fintech more as an opportunity than a threat to their business operations, now and in the next five years. Notably, a higher percentage of the incumbent banks see fintech as presenting opportunities across all financial services in the next five years. Although it may appear premature to evaluate the effectiveness of fintech adoption, there are already some early signs of payoff, with more than a third of the incumbent banks stating that their prime objectives of adopting fintech have been met.
With respect to the challenges facing banks, about three quarters to over 80% of the incumbent banks rate “difficulties in ensuring information security, data privacy, and protection,” “difficulties in retaining and attracting the right talents,” and “regulation related to Fintech evolution,” as either important or very important challenges to their fintech development, while about two-third of the incumbent banks rate “difference in regulatory standards across different jurisdictions” and “legacy IT systems” similarly. Among the incumbent banks, a larger share of the respondents from the foreign bank group considers “difference in regulatory standards across different jurisdictions” as important or very important than respondents from the retail bank group. These challenges are not specific to Hong Kong and can also be seen in the banking industries of other economies. To deal with some of these hurdles, policy makers could have a role to play.
The report mentions that preliminary research suggests that the adoption of fintech may have produced some positive effects on banks’ performance. Most banks take either a “proactive adopters” approach to achieve first mover’s advantage or a “reactive adopters” strategy where transformational changes are implemented at a steady pace. The pace and degree of fintech adoption will, however, hinge on whether the above-mentioned challenges can be overcome. HKMA has introduced several initiatives with the aim of addressing some related issues. It has also provided a number of guidance and recommendations to the banking industry related to fintech applications, in view of the evolving regulatory landscape. Virtual banks generally expect a bigger impact of fintech on traditional banking services and a more dramatic change in the structure of Hong Kong’s banking industry. If banks’ views are any guide, precautionary preparations for more dramatic changes in Hong Kong’s banking industry structure, such as strengthened monitoring on the fintech development as well as increased cooperation with different authorities responsible for oversight of regulatory functions related to fintech, may be warranted.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Fintech, Fintech Innovation, HKIMR, HKMA
Previous ArticleECB Issues Opinion on Revisions to CRR in Response to COVID Crisis
The European Commission (EC) published three Delegated Regulations (2021/2153, 2021/2154, and 2021/2155) to supplement the Investment Firms Directive (IFD or Directive 2019/2034).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that presents results of the sixth non-bank financial intermediation monitoring exercise in the Americas.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published the December issue of the Quarterly Review, which analyzes the non-bank financial intermediation mechanisms that could undermine financial stability.
The Bank of England (BoE) opened the Alternative Liquidity Facility, or ALF, for deposits from the participating UK-based Islamic banks for the first time.
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched three consultations on technical aspects of the revised framework capturing interest rate risks for banking book (IRRBB) positions, with the comment period ending on April 04, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the sample of banks for the mandatory Basel III monitoring exercise, which will refer to the December 2021 data.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) is adopting a proposal to revise and extend for three years the Complex Institution Liquidity Monitoring Report (FR 2052a) for banks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.