ESMA published advice from the Securities and Markets Stakeholders Group (or the Stakeholder Group) to the ESAs on the proposed regulatory technical standards on the content and presentation of information in context of the regulation on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector (Regulation 2019/2088). By introducing the Taxonomy Regulation’s Environmentally Sustainable Activities into the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, another piece of the puzzle is completed. Although the Group welcomes this, it remains worried about the complexity of the proposals, to a large extent resulting from piecemeal implementation of different sets of level 1 legislation, and offers suggestions for simplification. The Group also supports the ESA approach to amend the existing draft regulatory technical standards, instead of drafting a new set of regulatory standards.
The Stakeholders Group believes that the synergy between different pieces of legislation—particularly the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), the Taxonomy Regulation, and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)—and also adjacent legislation such as the Shareholders Rights Directive II and the scheduled reviews of MiFID and UCITS/AIFMD can contribute significantly to enhancing sustainability in the economy. However, neither the timings nor the concepts of these different pieces of legislation are fully aligned with one another. To reduce complexity, within the confines of Level 1 legislation, the Group suggested some subtle wording change, avoidance of duplication in questions, and clarifications with regard to the indicators. The following are the key highlights of the advice from the Stakeholder Group:
- Although the Group supports the ESA approach to amend the existing draft regulatory technical standards, this raises the question of the implementation date of requirements provided by these amended regulatory technical standards. The implementation date should consider the timeline of green asset ratio reporting under Article 8 of the Taxonomy regulation (which is planned in first quarter of 2022), as it would allow market participants to use reliable data from issuers. This will help ensure that clients will benefit from correct and consistent information.
- The Group believes that derivatives can serve many purposes, including ESG purposes. In such contexts, the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) can be extended to include derivatives, provided that it is adequately disclosed how they serve ESG purposes. On the issue of the KPI indicator, the Group is worried that the KPI tells only part of the story. Therefore, some instruments cannot be included (example sovereign bonds): social objectives are not yet included. The Group is also concerned that in the perception of the investor, the KPI gets undue prominence. For this reason, the Group supports an approach where the denominator excludes instruments that are not in scope of the Taxonomy Regulation. However, this should be complemented by another indicator that indicates the potential coverage of the Taxonomy Regulation.
- The Group believes that assessment by a third party would be useful. However, due to data problems and methodological challenges, it is reasonable to assume that in the beginning, financial companies will be on a learning curve. Thus, such assessment should be of an advisory, rather than a compliance nature at first. The Group also believes that the responsibility of the data on the investee companies rests with the investee companies themselves. This is something that should be provided for in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. It is likely that not only companies, but also the national competent authorities will be on a learning curve. For this reason, the Group proposes that the implementation of this legislation should be a prime focus of regulatory convergence.
- The Group also suggests that questions by financial institutions be primarily answered through ESMA Q&A, rather than bilaterally with national competent authorities.
Related Link: ESMA Advice (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Disclosures, Regulatory Technical Standards, SFDR, Taxonomy Regulation, ESG, SMSG, Climate Change Risk, NFRD, ESMA
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleFDIC Requests Information on Digital Asset Activities of Banks
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)