Featured Product

    ESMA Group Offers Advice on Proposals on Sustainability Disclosures

    May 17, 2021

    ESMA published advice from the Securities and Markets Stakeholders Group (or the Stakeholder Group) to the ESAs on the proposed regulatory technical standards on the content and presentation of information in context of the regulation on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector (Regulation 2019/2088). By introducing the Taxonomy Regulation’s Environmentally Sustainable Activities into the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, another piece of the puzzle is completed. Although the Group welcomes this, it remains worried about the complexity of the proposals, to a large extent resulting from piecemeal implementation of different sets of level 1 legislation, and offers suggestions for simplification. The Group also supports the ESA approach to amend the existing draft regulatory technical standards, instead of drafting a new set of regulatory standards.

    The Stakeholders Group believes that the synergy between different pieces of legislation—particularly the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), the Taxonomy Regulation, and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)—and also adjacent legislation such as the Shareholders Rights Directive II and the scheduled reviews of MiFID and UCITS/AIFMD can contribute significantly to enhancing sustainability in the economy. However, neither the timings nor the concepts of these different pieces of legislation are fully aligned with one another. To reduce complexity, within the confines of Level 1 legislation, the Group suggested some subtle wording change, avoidance of duplication in questions, and clarifications with regard to the indicators. The following are the key highlights of the advice from the Stakeholder Group:

    • Although the Group supports the ESA approach to amend the existing draft regulatory technical standards, this raises the question of the implementation date of requirements provided by these amended regulatory technical standards. The implementation date should consider the timeline of green asset ratio reporting under Article 8 of the Taxonomy regulation (which is planned in first quarter of 2022), as it would allow market participants to use reliable data from issuers. This will help ensure that clients will benefit from correct and consistent information.
    • The Group believes that derivatives can serve many purposes, including ESG purposes. In such contexts, the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) can be extended to include derivatives, provided that it is adequately disclosed how they serve ESG purposes. On the issue of the KPI indicator, the Group is worried that the KPI tells only part of the story. Therefore, some instruments cannot be included (example sovereign bonds): social objectives are not yet included. The Group is also concerned that in the perception of the investor, the KPI gets undue prominence. For this reason, the Group supports an approach where the denominator excludes instruments that are not in scope of the Taxonomy Regulation. However, this should be complemented by another indicator that indicates the potential coverage of the Taxonomy Regulation.
    • The Group believes that assessment by a third party would be useful. However, due to data problems and methodological challenges, it is reasonable to assume that in the beginning, financial companies will be on a learning curve. Thus, such assessment should be of an advisory, rather than a compliance nature at first. The Group also believes that the responsibility of the data on the investee companies rests with the investee companies themselves. This is something that should be provided for in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. It is likely that not only companies, but also the national competent authorities will be on a learning curve. For this reason, the Group proposes that the implementation of this legislation should be a prime focus of regulatory convergence.
    • The Group also suggests that questions by financial institutions be primarily answered through ESMA Q&A, rather than bilaterally with national competent authorities.

     

    Related Link: ESMA Advice (PDF)

     

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Disclosures, Regulatory Technical Standards, SFDR, Taxonomy Regulation, ESG, SMSG, Climate Change Risk, NFRD, ESMA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Publishes Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Taking Steps to Set Out and Enforce AI Regulations

    Many believe that the transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has potential to reshape the financial sector in the time to come.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISSB Releases Digital Sustainability Disclosures Taxonomy

    The themes of the harmonization and interoperability of sustainability disclosure standards among various jurisdictions remain at the top-of-mind for international standard-setting bodies.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Report Studies Implications of Digitalization of Finance

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published a report that examines the implications of the digitalization of finance for banks and supervisors.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Guidelines for Counterparty Credit Risk Management

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is seeking comments, until August 28, 2024, on guidelines for counterparty credit risk management of banks.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper Outlines Vision for Future Financial System

    In a recent paper, the General Manager of Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Indian entrepreneur (Infosys co-founder) Nandan Nilekani have laid out a vision for the Finternet, which is proposed to be a network of multiple financial ecosystems, much like the internet.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NGFS Outlines Options for Supervisory Review of Transition Plans

    The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) recently published three reports on the use of transition plans to boost sustainable finance and manage climate-related financial risks.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Issues Discussion Paper on Climate Scenario Analysis

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued a discussion paper on the use of climate scenario analysis to strengthen the management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Issues Phase2 Consultation on Climate Scenario Exercise for Banks

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) recently announced a consultation on the second phase of the Standardized Climate Scenario Exercise (SCSE) for banks and other financial institutions it regulates in Canada.

    April 25, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFIT to Chair Open Finance Taskforce Announced by UK Government

    The UK government announced the formation of an industry-led Open Finance Taskforce, chaired by the Center for Finance, Innovation, and Technology (CFIT).

    April 25, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8967