FIN-FSA implemented automatic checks related to the acceptable timeframe for supervisory reporting. The aim of the checks is to prevent unexpected re-submissions for the previous reference dates. Earlier, on May 09, 2019, FIN-FSA had announced that a new set of data quality checks will be tested in the FIN-FSA testing environment during May 9–24, 2019. It was announced that during the testing period, test reports for the reference dates prior to March 31, 2019 may be rejected
The acceptable timeframe for reporting is defined as a time period that begins on the reporting reference date and ends 45 calendar days after the submission deadline. Reports submitted outside the acceptable timeframe are rejected automatically. Submissions outside the timeframe can be permitted temporarily for 14 days if one of the following conditions is met:
- An institution provides a reasonable explanation for the re-submission by sending an e-mail to the relevant reporting helpdesk before submitting the report.
- FIN-FSA explicitly asks an institution to re-submit the report for some previous reference date.
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Banking, Automatic Checks, Acceptable Time Frames, Reporting, FIN-FSA
Previous ArticleFASB Publishes Summary of Investor Advisory Committee Meeting
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.