The European Council and the Parliament reached an agreement on the revised Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS2 Directive). The European Commission (EC) also welcomed the political agreement reached between the European Parliament and member states on the NIS2 Directive. Additionally, the European Council presidency and the European Parliament reached a provisional agreement on a draft regulation, also known as the "Daisy Chain" proposal, which amends the bank resolution framework in European Union.
The NIS2 Directive will set the baseline for cybersecurity risk management measures and reporting obligations across all sectors that are covered by the directive, such as energy, transport, health, and digital infrastructure. The directive will formally establish the European Cyber Crises Liaison Organization Network, EU-CyCLONe, which will support the coordinated management of large-scale cybersecurity incidents. The NIS2 directive introduces a size-cap rule. This means that all medium-size and large entities operating within the sectors or providing services covered by the Directive will fall within its scope. The provisionally agreed text includes additional provisions to ensure proportionality, a higher level of risk management, and clear-cut criticality criteria for determining the entities covered. The European Parliament and the Council have aligned the text with sector-specific legislation, in particular the regulation on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA) and the directive on the resilience of critical entities (CER). The two co-legislators have also streamlined the reporting obligations to avoid causing over-reporting and creating an excessive burden on the entities covered. Member states will have 21 months from the entry into force of the Directive in which to incorporate the provisions into their national law. The provisional agreement is now subject to approval by the Council and the European Parliament.
Meanwhile, the "Daisy Chain" proposal amends the bank resolution framework by:
- incorporating a dedicated treatment for the indirect subscription of instruments eligible for internal minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL)
- further aligning the treatment of global systemically important institution (G-SII) groups with a Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) resolution strategy with the treatment outlined in the Financial Stability Board's (FSB) international Total Loss-absorbing Capacity Term Sheet (the TLAC standard)
- clarifying the eligibility of instruments in the context of the internal TLAC
Under the provisional agreement, a revised deduction regime has been introduced, so as to avoid in particular double-counting of MREL elements at the level of intermediate entities. In addition, a carefully framed review clause has been added, to take into account the impact on different types of banking group structures. Such potential improvements will be assessed by the EC services, with a view to possible inclusion within the future Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) review proposal, expected from EC in the course of 2022. Under the provisional agreement, a transitional regime until end of 2024 has been introduced for MPE groups, subject to an assessment by the European Union resolution authorities. The provisional agreement reached is subject to approval by the Council and the European Parliament before going through the formal adoption procedure.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Basel, Regulatory Capital, NIS Directive, NIS 2, Cyber Risk, Resolution Framework, MREL, TLAC, BRRD, DORA, European Council, European Parliament, Regtech, EC, Subheadline
Previous ArticleEBA Issues Standards for Crowdfunding Service Providers Under ECSPR
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.