The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures. Across the two sessions, there was strong support for the key elements of IOSCO’s vision for an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) under the IFRS Foundation and a clear willingness among participants from all stakeholder constituencies to work collaboratively with IOSCO and the IFRS Foundation to deliver this vision. There was also broad-based agreement that, building on existing initiatives, the ISSB would be able to deliver high-quality international sustainability-related reporting standards to address the priority needs of capital market participants on a reasonable timeframe. The insights from these roundtables will be incorporated into IOSCO´s upcoming report on issuers´ sustainability disclosures, which is expected to be published in June 2021.
The following are the key highlights from the roundtables:
- Roundtable participants were united in their support for globally aligned reporting standards to promote comparability of sustainability-related disclosures across jurisdictions and to avoid market fragmentation. Many participants stressed that voluntary disclosure would not be enough and hence supported clear pathways toward mandatory reporting requirements aligned across jurisdictions, along with robust frameworks for audit and assurance.
- There was good support for taking as a starting point the climate-related financial disclosure prototype developed by the "group of five" leading sustainability reporting organizations, published in December 2020. This prototype builds from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations and other existing content.
- Participants noted the importance of the work of the newly formed IOSCO Technical Expert Group, in close cooperation with the IFRS Foundation Technical Working Group, to assess the key features of the prototype. Priority areas of focus suggested by participants included emphasis on quantitative metrics and standardization to promote consistency and comparability; clarity on how to report forward-looking metrics and on methodologies for scenario analysis; encouragement of a strong linkage between sustainability reporting and financial statements, including disclosure of key assumptions; a need for industry-specific standards and metrics to accommodate the different dependencies on natural, social, and human capital across different sectors of the economy; and promotion of digitization by developing a taxonomy for sustainability-related reporting in a structured electronic, machine-readable format.
- Feedback from participants underscored the need for a global architecture that is sufficiently flexible to accommodate a building blocks approach. There was support for IOSCO’s vision of a multi-stakeholder consultative committee under the IFRS Foundation to advise the ISSB and to promote interoperability with any sustainability reporting standards that extend beyond the common baseline of enterprise value oriented standards. However, participants stressed the importance of clearly articulating the purpose of such a committee as an advisory body to the ISSB and developing a structure and membership under the IFRS Foundation consistent with that purpose.
- The IFRS Foundation was encouraged to leverage existing advisory groups within its architecture that provide input to the standard setting process. In this way, the ISSB would benefit from the existing inclusive and multi-stakeholder due process already in place, including channels for consultation with stakeholders across regions. The proposed consultative committee should complement (not supersede) the existing advisory groups and outreach arrangements.
- Discussions noted that the design of ISSB standards should allow for interoperability, not only with jurisdiction-specific requirements that go beyond enterprise value creation, but also for the expansion of scope to other sustainability topics beyond climate and ongoing standards evolution to accommodate the dynamic materiality of sustainability topics over time.
Related Link: Press Release (PDF)
Keywords: International, Securities, International Sustainability Standards Board, Climate Change Risk, TCFD, Sustainable Finance, ESG, ISS, IOSCO
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleAPRA to Finalize Capital Adequacy Standard Revisions by January 2022
Next ArticleEBA Publishes Data on Deposit Guarantee Schemes
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria to identify shadow banking entities for the purposes of reporting large exposures.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/786 with regard to the liquidity coverage requirements for credit institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published the strategic plan for 2022-2025 and the departmental plan for 2022-23.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is consulting, until August 31, 2022, on the draft implementing technical standards specifying requirements for the information that sellers of non-performing loans (NPLs) shall provide to prospective buyers.
The European Council and the Parliament reached an agreement on the revised Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS2 Directive).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying information that crowdfunding service providers shall provide to investors on the calculation of credit scores and prices of crowdfunding offers.
The European Council published a draft Commission Delegated Regulation to amend the regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a paper that examines the systemic risk posed by increasing use of cloud services, along with the potential policy options to mitigate this risk.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published amendments to Notice 635, which sets out requirements that a bank in Singapore has to comply with when granting an unsecured non-card credit facility to individuals.
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.