The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures. Across the two sessions, there was strong support for the key elements of IOSCO’s vision for an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) under the IFRS Foundation and a clear willingness among participants from all stakeholder constituencies to work collaboratively with IOSCO and the IFRS Foundation to deliver this vision. There was also broad-based agreement that, building on existing initiatives, the ISSB would be able to deliver high-quality international sustainability-related reporting standards to address the priority needs of capital market participants on a reasonable timeframe. The insights from these roundtables will be incorporated into IOSCO´s upcoming report on issuers´ sustainability disclosures, which is expected to be published in June 2021.
The following are the key highlights from the roundtables:
- Roundtable participants were united in their support for globally aligned reporting standards to promote comparability of sustainability-related disclosures across jurisdictions and to avoid market fragmentation. Many participants stressed that voluntary disclosure would not be enough and hence supported clear pathways toward mandatory reporting requirements aligned across jurisdictions, along with robust frameworks for audit and assurance.
- There was good support for taking as a starting point the climate-related financial disclosure prototype developed by the "group of five" leading sustainability reporting organizations, published in December 2020. This prototype builds from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations and other existing content.
- Participants noted the importance of the work of the newly formed IOSCO Technical Expert Group, in close cooperation with the IFRS Foundation Technical Working Group, to assess the key features of the prototype. Priority areas of focus suggested by participants included emphasis on quantitative metrics and standardization to promote consistency and comparability; clarity on how to report forward-looking metrics and on methodologies for scenario analysis; encouragement of a strong linkage between sustainability reporting and financial statements, including disclosure of key assumptions; a need for industry-specific standards and metrics to accommodate the different dependencies on natural, social, and human capital across different sectors of the economy; and promotion of digitization by developing a taxonomy for sustainability-related reporting in a structured electronic, machine-readable format.
- Feedback from participants underscored the need for a global architecture that is sufficiently flexible to accommodate a building blocks approach. There was support for IOSCO’s vision of a multi-stakeholder consultative committee under the IFRS Foundation to advise the ISSB and to promote interoperability with any sustainability reporting standards that extend beyond the common baseline of enterprise value oriented standards. However, participants stressed the importance of clearly articulating the purpose of such a committee as an advisory body to the ISSB and developing a structure and membership under the IFRS Foundation consistent with that purpose.
- The IFRS Foundation was encouraged to leverage existing advisory groups within its architecture that provide input to the standard setting process. In this way, the ISSB would benefit from the existing inclusive and multi-stakeholder due process already in place, including channels for consultation with stakeholders across regions. The proposed consultative committee should complement (not supersede) the existing advisory groups and outreach arrangements.
- Discussions noted that the design of ISSB standards should allow for interoperability, not only with jurisdiction-specific requirements that go beyond enterprise value creation, but also for the expansion of scope to other sustainability topics beyond climate and ongoing standards evolution to accommodate the dynamic materiality of sustainability topics over time.
Related Link: Press Release (PDF)
Keywords: International, Securities, International Sustainability Standards Board, Climate Change Risk, TCFD, Sustainable Finance, ESG, ISS, IOSCO
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleAPRA to Finalize Capital Adequacy Standard Revisions by January 2022
Next ArticleEBA Publishes Data on Deposit Guarantee Schemes
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.
The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.