Pentti Hakkarainen of ECB spoke about the proportionate approach to banking supervision in EU, while speaking at the BIS-IMF policy implementation meeting on proportionality in banking regulation and supervision in Basel. He emphasized that proportionality is an inherently subjective concept and is a key obligation for all bank supervisors. During his speech, he described the concept of proportionality in bank supervision and explained the day-to-day reality of the way ECB implements proportionate supervision.
ECB directly supervises 117 significant banking groups, with these institutions accounting for over 80% of the banking assets across the euro area. All other euro area banks are supervised day-to-day by the national competent authorities, with the ECB providing an indirect oversight function for the national authorities’ supervision of these less significant institutions, or LSIs. "This split of roles and responsibilities between ECB and national competent authorities allows the same supervisory objectives to be pursued efficiently in both large and small banks. That efficiency is one of the key elements of proportionate supervision," said Mr. Hakkarainen. LSIs tend to focus on the domestic market of the country in which they are based. This makes the local expertise and geographical proximity of the national competent authority supervisors particularly useful in ensuring the efficient monitoring of prudential soundness.
In context of the ECB approach to proportionality, he explained that the first step in arranging the supervisory work is to set a minimum level of supervisory engagement that applies to all banks. This allows ECB to ensure that all banks are held to the same standards and that supervisory intensity is, in all cases, sufficient to demonstrate that these standards are met. From this minimum engagement level, extra layers of supervisory requirements are added in a proportionate way. These layers vary depending on the risk profile of the bank in question. The calibration of the additional layers of supervision is captured in a detailed annual supervisory examination plan. This plan sets out the supervisory activities to be undertaken for each of the significant institutions in the coming year, including risk-based decisions on what on-site inspections and internal model investigations to pursue. At the end of the supervisory analysis, proportionate supervisory measures must be applied. The key tool for applying proportionate supervisory measures is the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). These supervisory measures have become more proportionate over the five years since the Single Supervisory Mechanism was set up. One way of measuring this is to look at the correlation between the SREP scores of significant institutions and the Pillar 2 capital requirements that ECB imposes on them. Five years ago this correlation was below 30% and now it is steady at about 80%.
ECB is proportionate in its oversight function and in how it designs guidance for national competent authorities regarding their day-to-day supervisory activities. The main way in which ECB ensures that its oversight of the national competent authorities’ supervision is proportionate is by ranking the LSIs. The LSIs are categorized as high, medium, or low priority and this categorization is reviewed each year in cooperation with the national competent authorities. The LSIs are prioritized according to, first, the impact their failure would have on the domestic financial system and, second, their intrinsic riskiness. Greater riskiness and a larger potential impact on the financial system imply more intensive supervisory attention. The ECB uses this prioritization of LSIs to apply the principle of proportionality in a number of its oversight tasks. For instance, the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Framework Regulation provides that national competent authorities send certain ex ante notifications and fulfill certain ex post reporting requirements vis-à-vis the ECB to ensure that the ECB can adequately exercise its oversight of the functioning of the SSM. The principle of proportionality is also an important criterion for the ECB when assessing incoming ex ante notifications and determining the intensity of the review to be performed.
ECB assesses the impact of the planned measures from a supervisory and risk perspective and examines whether the measures are proportionate. Regarding regular ex post reporting requirements, ECB requires national competent authorities to submit institution-specific information and information related to their supervision of LSIs only if it is deemed material and proportionate. Hence, the depth and frequency of ex post reporting are adapted to the priority rank of the LSI. The ECB framework for the institution-specific oversight of LSIs is also based on the prioritization of institutions. A less granular and less frequent assessment is normally conducted for the banks that have been assigned a low or medium priority. However, this is not always the case. For example, if a thematic review were to indicate that a lower-priority institution was more risky and complex than expected, the principle of proportionality would require a stricter and more intrusive approach to be taken.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Proportionality, SSM, SREP, Banking Supervision, Less Significant Institutions, Banking Union, ECB
Previous ArticleBCRA Updates Minimum Capital Requirements and Information Regime
Next ArticleFSB Publishes Update on Meeting of RCG for Europe
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
ECB finalized guidance on the way it expects banks to prudently manage and transparently disclose climate and other environmental risks under the current prudential rules.
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
FSB published a progress report on the implementation of reforms to major interest rate benchmarks, including the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark.