APRA published a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide authorized deposit-taking institutions with an up-to-date guidance on supervisory expectations during the period of disruption driven by COVID-19. The FAQs clarify the regulatory capital approach for loan repayment deferrals and the guidance for serviceability assessments in the Prudential Practice Guide APG 223 on residential mortgage lending. The FAQs are expected to be updated periodically over the coming months.
The FAQs set out that the regulatory capital approach of APRA specifies that, over the next six months, banks do not need to treat the period of the repayment deferral as a period of arrears for capital purposes. As per APRA, the regulatory capital approach can be applied to a broad class of otherwise performing loans on which authorized deposit-taking institutions grant repayments deferrals. This includes loans that are less than 90 days past due and not impaired at the time deferral was granted. Authorized deposit-taking institutions should publicly disclose the nature and terms of any repayment deferrals given to a broad class of loans and the volume of loans to which they are applied. These institutions should also closely monitor the portfolio credit risk of this cohort of loans, and are required to report to APRA information on the volume and risk profile of this segment of the portfolio.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Residential Mortgage Lending, Credit Risk, COVID-19, FAQ, Regulatory Capital, Loan Moratorium, Basel, APRA
Previous ArticleFSI Chair Outlines Future Strategy of the Institute
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.