ESAs launched two joint consultations to amend regulatory technical standards on the clearing obligation and risk mitigation techniques for uncleared OTC derivatives. The standards aim to amend the current European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) on the clearing obligation and risk-mitigation techniques on OTC derivatives not cleared by central counterparties (CCPs), to provide a specific treatment for simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) securitization. Comments to these consultations can be sent to EBA and ESMA until June 15, 2018.
The securitization regulation and the amended EMIR provide a specific treatment for STS securitizations in relation to the clearing obligation and on risk-mitigation techniques on non-cleared OTC derivatives frameworks. The consultation on the draft regulatory technical standards on the clearing obligation clarifies which arrangements under covered bonds or securitizations adequately mitigate counterparty risk and, thus, may benefit from an exemption from the clearing obligation. The consultation on the draft regulatory technical standards on risk-mitigation techniques aims to extend the type of special treatment currently associated with covered bonds to STS securitizations. The proposed treatment—that is, no exchange of initial margins and collection only of variation margins—is applicable only where the STS securitization structure meets a specific set of conditions equivalent to the ones required for covered bonds issuers to be able to benefit of that same treatment. ESAs have developed these two consultation papers in accordance with Articles 4 and 11 of EMIR, as amended under Article 42 of the Securitization Regulation.
- EBA Press Release
- ESMA Press Release
- Standards on Clearing Obligation (PDF)
- Risk Mitigation Standards
Comment Due Date: June 15, 2018
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Technical Standards, EMIR, Securitization Regulation, STS Securitization, ESAs
Previous ArticleDanièle Nouy of ECB Speaks on Good Governance for Good Decisions
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.