MAS proposed changes to the guidelines on technology risk management and business continuity management. The proposed changes take into account the rapidly changing physical and cyber threat landscape and will require financial institutions to put in place enhanced measures to strengthen operational resilience. The two guidelines continue to emphasize the importance of risk culture, along with the roles of Board of Directors and senior management in technology risk and business continuity management. The comment period for the proposed guidelines ends on April 08, 2019.
Under the technology risk management guidelines, the proposed changes relate to technology risk governance and oversight, effective cyber surveillance, secure software development, and emerging technologies. The proposals were developed in close partnership with the financial industry. The MAS Cyber Security Advisory Panel (CSAP), which comprises international cyber security thought leaders, provided valuable inputs in shaping these proposals.
The second consultation is on the business continuity management guidelines, which raise standards for financial institutions in the development of business continuity plans that will better account for interdependencies across financial institutions’ operational units and linkages with external service providers. Financial institutions are encouraged to put in place an independent audit program to regularly review the effectiveness of their efforts on business continuity management.
Comment Due Date: April 08, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Business Continuity, Technology Risk, Cyber Security, Operational Risk, Cyber Risk, Regtech, MAS
Previous ArticleEC Welcomes Agreement on Sustainable Investment Disclosure Rules
Next ArticleBIS Announces Appointment of the New BCBS Chair
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.