PRA Finalizes Policy on Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk Management
PRA published the policy statement PS7/21 that sets out the final supervisory statement SS2/21 on outsourcing and third-party risk management. Firms will be expected to comply with the expectations in SS2/21 by March 31, 2022. PS7/21 also contains feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP30/19, which was published in December 2019 and had set out proposals to modernize the regulatory framework on outsourcing and third-party risk management. PRA revised the policy in SS2/21 based on responses received to CP30/19; the revisions relate to the text on definition of outsourcing, proportionality, governance and record-keeping, pre-outsourcing phase, outsourcing agreements, data security, and business continuity and exit plans.
SS2/21 elaborates on the definition of outsourcing in the PRA Rulebook. It notes that there are arrangements between firms and third parties that fall outside this definition and are, consequently, outside the scope of the existing requirements on outsourcing and some of the detailed expectations in SS2/21. However, these third-party arrangements are still subject to the PRA Fundamental Rules and other PRA requirements and expectations on business continuity, governance, operational resilience, and risk management. SS2/21 clarifies the application of the principle of proportionality to intragroup outsourcing and to "non-significant firms." SS2/21 further sets out the expectations on governance, including under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR), and record keeping. SS2/21 also sets out expectations for firms during the pre-outsourcing phase and aims to:
- Complement the requirements and expectations on operational resilience, as set out in the PRA Rulebook, SS1/21, and statement of policy on operational resilience
- Facilitate greater resilience and adoption of the cloud and other new technologies, as set out in the response of BoE to the "Future of Finance" report
- Implement the EBA guidelines on outsourcing arrangements and clarify how PRA expects banks to approach the EBA Outsourcing Guidelines in the context of its requirements and expectations
- Implement the relevant sections of the EBA guidelines on information and communication technology and security risk management
Outsourcing arrangements entered into on or after March 31, 2021 should meet the expectations in SS2/21 by March 31, 2022. Firms should seek to review and update legacy outsourcing agreements entered into before March 31, 2021 at the first appropriate contractual renewal or revision point to meet the expectations in SS2/21 as soon as possible on or after March 31, 2022. SS7/21 is relevant to banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, insurance and reinsurance firms, groups in scope of Solvency II, including the Society of Lloyd’s and managing agents, and branches of overseas banks and insurers. Some content in SS2/21 is also relevant to credit unions and non-directive firms. The policy set out in PS7/21 has been designed in the context of the UK having left EU and the transition period having come to an end. Unless otherwise stated, any references to EU or EU-derived legislation refer to the version of the legislation that forms part of the retained EU law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework.
Related Links
Effective Date: March 31, 2022
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Proportionality, Operational Resilience, Third-Party Arrangements, Operational Risk, Outsourcing Risk, PRA
Related Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
