EIOPA Chairman Speaks on Review of Solvency II Regulation in 2018
The EIOPA Chairman Gabriel Bernardino spoke at the Public Hearing on the 2018 Review of the Solvency II Delegated Regulation in Brussels. He highlighted the need to ensure that "the regime remains fit-for-purpose, works for insurance companies of all sizes and types, and that we continue to preserve regulatory certainty." He mentioned that, in its Advice to EC, EIOPA analyzed 29 topics focused on the three main areas—that is, increasing proportionality, removing unjustified constraints to financing the economy, and removing technical inconsistencies.
With respect to proportionality, the focus was on small and medium-size insurers and reduced granularity, where risk profiles justified this. EIOPA advised to further simplify calculations for a number of sub-modules such as natural, manmade, and health catastrophes. To reduce over-reliance on external credit ratings in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement or SCR, EIOPA recommended applying simplified calculations by nominating only one credit rating agency and calculating capital requirements for the remaining non-complex assets only subject to the credit quality step 3. One of the main simplifications is the reduced burden on the treatment of lookthrough to underlying investments. Access to data was always an issue and EIOPA recommended allowing the grouping of underlying exposures and simplifications for the calculation of capital requirements. This change should be a significant relief in terms of administrative burden. Other simplifications included relief in the assessment of lapse and counterparty default risks.
Other topics that constitute a substantial part of the EIOPA Advice, according to the EIOPA Chairman, are interest rate risks, loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes, and risk margin. To improve calculation of capital requirements for interest rate risks, EIOPA recommended to implement new calibrations (current calibration with data up to 2008) that take recent evidence such as negative rates into account. Given the material impact on the capital requirements for certain types of insurers, EIOPA suggested to implement the methodology gradually over three years to mitigate the impact. To strike a reasonable balance between flexibility and foster greater supervisory convergence, EIOPA developed a set of key principles, consistent with the Solvency II framework, that allow proportionality and flexibility in the calculation while increasing the comparability of outcomes. He also added that, "we are of the opinion that the cost-of-capital needs to be kept on the same level while the review of other aspects of the risk margin should be assessed in the upcoming overall review of the Solvency II regime scheduled for 2021."
Finally, Mr. Bernardino emphasized that, with the changes proposed in the two sets of Advice by EIOPA, accompanied by a full impact assessment, complexity will be reduced while a proportionate, technically robust, risk-sensitive, and consistent supervisory regime for the insurance sector is retained. He concluded that "the proposed adjustments will reinforce Solvency II as a modern, risk-based, and proportionate regime; a European regime that is the worldwide reference on insurance regulation."
Related Link: Speech (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, 2018 Review, Proportionality, SCR, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
ESMA Issues Translations for Guidelines on Stress Test ScenariosRelated Articles
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
BIS Bulletin Examines Cognitive Limits of Large Language Models
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
ECB is Conducting First Cyber Risk Stress Test for Banks
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
EBA Continues Momentum Toward Strengthening Prudential Rules for Banks
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
EU and UK Agencies Issue Updates on Final Basel III Rules
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards