Considering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, ISDA submitted a letter on behalf of 21 industry associations and their members requesting BCBS, IOSCO, and global regulators to suspend the current timeline for the initial margin phase-in to allow market participants to focus their resources on ensuring continued access to the derivatives market. Given the uncertainty, ISDA recommends that revised deadlines for phase-five and phase-six implementation be set once the overall impact of COVID-19 is known. ISDA also stresses that it is essential that markets remain open, wherever possible, to ensure critical payments and transactions can be fulfilled and firms are able to manage their exposures—a position set out in a letter to FSB and IOSCO and in a joint letter to US authorities last week.
Regulators have previously taken in recognition of the challenges that the initial margin rules will pose to smaller firms. Last July, for example, BCBS and IOSCO extended the phase-in timeline to give the smallest entities an extra year to comply. According to the ISDA analysis, that means 3,616 counterparty relationships will have to meet the requirements in September 2020, rather than the initial 9,059. Even with this change, though, the number of firms in scope for phase five is far in excess of the number that has had to comply so far—and this would have posed a compliance challenge even in normal times. In the current situation, meeting the documentation and operational requirements would be all but impossible in an environment of staff shortages, remote working, and extreme market volatility.
The phase-five implementation date of September 2020 may seem a long way away, but much of the preparation needs to be done now. With the focus on business continuity, little or no spare capacity is available to deploy and test infrastructure, run average aggregate notional amount (AANA) calculations, and implement margin calculation systems. AANA calculations are necessary for hundreds of counterparties to determine whether they will be subject to the regulatory initial margin requirements. All in-scope counterparties also need to calculate and monitor initial margin amounts. That means the impact of keeping the current phase-in dates will extend far beyond the number of relationships that will actually need to exchange initial margin. In light of the unprecedented circumstances, ISDA is urging global regulators to announce a delay to phase five sooner rather than later. ISDA CEO also pointed out that the largest, most systemically important firms would still be required to meet initial margin requirements, thus mitigating risk in the derivatives market.
While urging the authorities to keep markets open during this time, ISDA point out that it does have a well-established process in place to deal with market closures and the impact on derivatives. However, even with this process, working through the practical implications of a market closure is complex and time-consuming, especially at a time when most institutions have few resources to spare. It can also lead to fragmented, imperfect outcomes.
- Letter to BCBS and IOSCO
- Comments of ISDA CEO
- Keeping Markets Open
- Letter to FSB and IOSCO
- Letter to US Authorities (PDF)
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, OTC Derivatives, Initial Margin, Timeline, COVID-19, BCBS, IOSCO, ISDA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleFED and FFIEC Offer Reporting Relief to Institutions Due to COVID-19
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.