FSB published the feedback it received on the effects of financial regulatory reforms on small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME) financing. About twenty organizations, including Moody's Investors Service, European Banking Federation, Bank Policy Institute, Institute of International Finance, NASDAQ, and World Council of Credit Unions, responded to this call for feedback. FSB, on February 25, 2019, had requested stakeholder feedback on the specified issues and it will use the feedback to prepare its draft report on SME evaluation, which will be issued for public consultation ahead of the June 2019 G20 Summit. The final report, reflecting the feedback from the public consultation, will be published in October 2019.
On February 25, 2019, FSB had also published a note that summarizes the main concerns raised in the FSB roundtable on the effects of financial regulatory reforms on SME financing. At the FSB roundtable, it was noted that, while internationally agreed reforms play a role, the interaction of the reforms with other domestic regulation and public policies, as well as how the regulation is implemented and interpreted by relevant authorities, ultimately determines the extent to which various economic actors, including SMEs, are affected. Basel III was identified by participants as the most relevant reform. Some participants expressed concern that banks may have increased the pricing and the proportion of secured SME lending—as well as reduced credit to riskier firms—including as a result of the reduced eligibility of collateral (both intangibles and physical collateral) for regulatory capital purposes. In that context, some participants raised the question of whether regulation strikes the right balance in terms of overall financing structure needs of SMEs. Other potentially relevant reforms that the participants identified included the following:
- Accounting rules (IFRS 9), which may incentivize banks to reduce the maturity of SME loans, to request higher collateralization, and to reduce credit availability in a downturn
- Insurance regulation such as Solvency II, preventing insurance companies from investing in securitizations of SME loans
- Domestic stress test frameworks, which may "disproportionally" affect SME finance because of the penalizing implicit risk-weight assumptions embedded in some of these tests
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Accounting, Regulatory Reform, SME, Basel III, Solvency II, IFRS 9, Responses to Calculation, FSB
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Report Related to the IORP II Directive
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.