FCA published the final guidance to provide support to mortgage customers facing payment difficulties due to circumstances stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Section 7, titled "Repossessions," of this guidance has been updated on March 25, 2021, with effect from March 20, 2021, to set out the FCA expectations in respect of repossessions from April 01, 2021. This guidance is for firms dealing with mortgage customers experiencing payment difficulties due to coronavirus, including those who cannot resume payments after taking payment deferrals under the Payment Deferral Guidance, and for firms considering or taking repossession action. The guidance originally came into force on September 16, 2020 and remains in force until varied or revoked.
The guidance confirms that, from April 01, 2021, subject to any relevant government rules that prevent enforced repossessions for public health reasons, firms taking steps to enforce repossession of properties should only do so as a last resort in accordance with the FCA rules, updated guidance, and normal legal processes. The guidance also highlights that, as the deadline to apply for a payment deferral ends on March 31, 2021, FCA wants to reassure consumers in financial difficulty that support will continue to be available under the Tailored Support Guidance. FCA also published a report on how the firms are implementing this tailored support. The report is relevant for mortgage lenders and administrators, smaller deposit-taking lenders, non-bank mortgage lenders, credit card and loan providers, high-cost credit firms, and motor finance firms. The report found that firms have progressed well in implementing the Tailored Support Guidance and have acted quickly to build their capacity, though the report also highlights the improvement areas for firms. The following are the key findings of the report:
- Consumers have generally been able to get support as they come to the end of a payment deferral. FCA has not identified any systemic issues with firms' ability to meet the demand from customers seeking further help. The support identified in the report has typically been short term in nature, given the uncertainty of customers’ financial circumstances during the pandemic.
- All assessed firms had vulnerable customer policies in place and, as noted, 94% of mortgage firms and 64% of credit firms had reviewed or added to these policies light of the pandemic. Firms are encouraged to review the recently published guidance on vulnerable consumers and to embed relevant aspects into their processes to ensure that vulnerable customers are treated fairly.
- Due to the pandemic, some firms anticipated an increase in demand from customers in financial difficulty and recruited more staff to address that demand. Thus, there has been a significant increase in inexperienced staff helping customers, which may lead to an increased risk of harm. Firms are expected to ensure that all staff members are adequately trained and supervised to ensure that the right support is provided to customers.
- Some firms accelerated plans to automate aspects of the customer support journey. FCA found that, in general, these automated approaches were easy to navigate with minimal steps and helpful menus for customers to select from. However, some firms could improve the ease of access to non-digital support.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, COVID-19, Credit Risk, Payment Deferrals, Consumer Credit, FCA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleCBB Consults on Liquidity Risk Module and SME Financing Requirements
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.