ESMA issued an opinion providing further guidance on the treatment of packages under the trading obligation for derivatives, which the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) introduced on January 03, 2018. ESMA notes that the trading obligation is designed to apply at the level of a financial instrument and not at the level of the package. Therefore, only components of a package are subject to the trading obligation, but not the package.
Under MiFID II, trading obligation for derivatives does not provide for a tailored regime for packages, which is likely to result in the divergent application of the trading obligation for derivatives in the EU. To ensure a consistent application of the trading obligation across EU, ESMA issued this opinion, which clarifies, through a positive list, the categories of packages for which the derivative components subject to the trading obligation are always required to be traded on a trading venue. Package orders/transactions are composed of two or more financial instruments that are priced as a single unit, simultaneously executed, and where the execution of each component is contingent on the execution of all other components. Packages are a relevant part of the financial markets by enabling investment firms and their clients to conduct trades for risk management and hedging purposes.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, MiFID II, MiFIR, Trading Obligation, OTC Derivatives, ESMA
Previous ArticleBOG Issues the Capital Requirements Directive Under Basel II
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.