JFSA presented the results of a joint survey it conducted with BOJ on the quantitative London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) exposures and the qualitative LIBOR transition progress. The survey was conducted on 278 financial institutions, including banks, securities companies, and insurance companies. The survey results highlight that, since the LIBOR transition requires comprehensive actions, specific preparations are needed with responsible and active involvement of management officials. As the next steps, JFSA and BOJ will monitor whether financial institutions take necessary actions in view of the time limit of end-2021. To this end, the two entities will deliberate on the need to set more specific core targets and conduct on-site monitoring, taking into account the progress in financial institutions’ preparations for LIBOR transition.
As per the assessment, the key actions needed are as follows:
- Financial institutions with a large number of contracts maturing beyond end-2021 with no fallback provisions should press ahead with necessary actions for customers given the limited time available. They need to promptly set policies on new products referencing risk-free rat and on new contracts referencing LIBOR, so that the number of contracts referencing LIBOR will not increase.
- Financial institutions with a larger number of contracts need to strengthen coordination among customer services, back office, and legal sections as they may incur more costs on those sections than anticipated. Even if they have fallback provisions, if they take the “amendment approach,” they need to prepare for scenarios where a number of consultations with customers can arise at one time.
- Financial institutions that have not identified IT systems requiring upgrades need to do so promptly. Considering the time required to complete such upgrades, they need to prioritize which systems to upgrade first, clarify the schedule, and secure sufficient budgets for such upgrades.
- Financial institutions that have issued bonds referencing LIBOR must take procedures according to the applicable laws of each jurisdiction to revise contractual terms; in principle, they need to host bondholders’ meetings for those issued in Japan, based on the Companies Act.
- If financial institutions use LIBOR for their asset-liability management and other risk management, they need to consider reviewing their management framework.
- Financial institutions need to identify issues and concerns associated with accounting and discuss them with outside auditors.
The two-fold aim of this survey is to allow supervisory authorities to identify the financial institutions’ quantification of LIBOR exposure (the number of contracts referencing LIBOR), these institutions' progress toward transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rates, and their internal preparedness for this transition. The survey is planned to be conducted regularly to follow up the progress and status of LIBOR transition.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Japan, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmark Reforms, BOJ, JFSA
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.
FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.
ECB published eleventh issue of the Macroprudential Bulletin, which provides insight into the ongoing work of ECB in the field of macro-prudential policy.
HM Treasury issued a call for evidence seeking views to reform the prudential regulatory regime—also known as Solvency II—of the insurance sector in UK.
ESRB responded to the EC consultation on review of Solvency II regime.
HM Treasury launched a consultation on Phase II of the Future Regulatory Framework Review, with the comment period ending on January 19, 2021.
EC adopted the work program for 2021.