ESAs Consult on Taxonomy-Related Sustainability Disclosures
ESAs proposed the regulatory technical standards on disclosures of financial products investing in economic activities that contribute to an environmental investment objective. The proposed standards also address how and to what extent activities funded by the product are taxonomy-aligned. The Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) empowers ESAs, by amending the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088), to develop the regulatory technical standards on “taxonomy-related product disclosures.” The comment period for this proposal ends on May 12, 2021.
To fulfil the taxonomy-related product empowerments, ESAs have agreed to amend the soon to be finalized SFDR regulatory technical standards, instead of creating a new ruleset, to minimize duplication and complexity in this area. ESAs’ aim is to have the regulatory technical standards on disclosures rules function as a “single rulebook” for sustainability disclosures at Level 2 for both the original empowerments in SFDR and the additional ones added by Taxonomy Regulation. ESAs also agreed to create one set of regulatory technical standards for all the environmental taxonomy-related disclosures (covering the six objectives of Article 9 of Taxonomy Regulation), with two different deadlines for application, depending on which sets of environmental objectives are relevant for the product. The application dates would follow the dates set in Article 27 of the Taxonomy Regulation, but all the rules would be provided in one text. The draft regulatory technical standards of ESAs provide for the content and presentation of additional information to the SFDR product disclosures where the product makes sustainable investments contributing to environmental objectives.
This consultation proposes a set of amending Articles for products making sustainable investments, more specifically investing in activities with environmental objectives in compliance with the Taxonomy Regulation. The amendments are targeted at Article 9 of SFDR products but are also relevant for Article 8 of SFDR products that intend to make sustainable investments in environmental objectives in compliance with the Taxonomy Regulation. Furthermore, as the SFDR regulatory technical standards included templates for pre-contractual and periodic information, the taxonomy-related product regulator standards also provide amended templates in which taxonomy-specific elements are required, as set out in amended Annexes II, III, IV, and V of these draft amending regulatory technical standards. ESAs have included, for illustrative purposes, a draft set of consolidated SFDR regulatory technical standards as an annex to this consultation paper, to show what the changed regulatory standards would look like, as amended by the changes proposed by ESAs. Overall, the proposal of ESAs on how and to what extent activities funded by the product are taxonomy-aligned consists of two elements:
- A graphical representation of the taxonomy-alignment of investments of the financial product and a key performance indicator calculation for that alignment
- A statement that the activities funded by the product that qualify as environmentally sustainable are compliant with the detailed criteria of the Taxonomy Regulation
The approach taken to amend the SFDR regulatory standards meant that ESAs were not able to start the work on these amending regulatory standards until the SFDR regulatory technical standards were in near final form at start of 2021. This has delayed the launch of this consultation paper. Considering the deadline for delivery of the regulatory technical standards (June 01, 2021), ESAs have provided for an eight-week consultation period, instead of the usual three months. Nonetheless, it is likely that ESAs will issue a final report with the draft regulatory technical standards by late June or early July 2021.
Comment Due Date: May 12, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Disclosures, ESG, Taxonomy Regulation, SFDR, Regulatory Technical Standards, ESAs
Michael Denton, PhD, PE
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Credit analytics expert helping clients understand, develop, and implement credit models for origination, monitoring, and regulatory reporting.
Previous ArticleEBA Consults on Revised Guidelines on Risk-Based AML/CFT Supervision
NGFS Updates Address Short-Term Climate Scenarios and Transition Plans
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) is exploring the development of short-term climate scenarios to complement its existing scenario framework of long-term climate scenarios.
ISSB Updates Address ESG Issues while IASB Consults on Impairments
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) is seeking feedback, until August 09, 2023, on the exposure draft that sets out the methodology proposed by ISSB to amend the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards' metrics
ESRB Publishes Report on Cryptos and DeFi; ECB Updates on Digital Euro
The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that outlines the systemic implications of crypto markets and proposes policy options to address the risks stemming from crypto-assets and decentralized finance or DeFi.
EU Agencies Issue Updates on DORA, ESAP, and Crowdfunding Regulation
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published a discussion paper on their joint advice to the European Commission (EC) on proposals to specify criteria for critical information and communication technology (ICT) third-party service providers
UK Authorities Issue Updates, Finalize Policy on Model Risk Management
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) finalized the model risk management principles for banks, the policy statement PS5/23 on risks from contingent leverage, and PS4/23 on moving senior managers regime forms from the PRA Rulebook.
APRA Revises Implementation Timeline for Operational Risk Standard
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) updated the implementation date of the new cross-industry prudential standard CPS 230 on operational risk management
BCBS Consults on Basel FAQs and Amendments, Issues Other Updates
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published a report assessing implementation of the global Basel standards on net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and large exposures (LEX) in South Africa
EBA Announces Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates in April 2023
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published consultations on the amendments to the guidelines on risk-based anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) supervision
FSB Issues Statement on USD LIBOR Transition, Issues Other Updates
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) released a report that offers insights into how financial institutions incorporate climate-related metrics into their compensation frameworks
ACPR Issues Updates on Reporting by Banks and on DLT Pilot Scheme
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published reporting updates for the banking sector