FIN-FSA Outlines Focus Areas and Publishes Annual Report for 2019
FIN-FSA published the annual report for 2019, highlighting digitalization, climate change, and anti-money laundering as special issues in its activities. These are also prominent objectives in the FIN-FSA strategy for 2020–2022, which was updated during the review year. As an Annex to the annual report, FIN-FSA also published the list of entities it supervises.
In the Director's review section, the FIN-FSA Director Anneli Tuominen highlighted that a supervisor must understand not only the benefits of digitalization for the business but also the risks associated with digitalization, whether it uses data and artificial intelligence applications or addresses cyber risks. She also mentioned that, from the point of view of financial stability, it is important to consider the impact of climate change and climate policy on supervised persons' risk in assessing the activities of supervised entities. In its work as a supervisor, FIN-FSA is also involved in determining which investments can be considered green. It is also important that green investment is not promoted by easing the capital requirements of operators, as capital requirements must continue to be risk-based. All in all, the impact of climate change on the risk management and risk taking of the supervised entities is significant.
Ms. Tuominen also highlighted that the insurance sector is currently assessing the impact of the Solvency II regulatory reform on the supervised area. In particular, the discount rate assumption used in the capital adequacy calculations requires modernization, as the discount rate is currently too high compared to market rates. This means that companies' technical provisions have been underestimated, especially for long-term liabilities. Similarly, the treatment of interest rate risk in the capital adequacy calculation should be corrected to take into account the current interest rate environment. If the goal is not to increase regulatory requirements, then it should be carefully evaluated what parameters and how to adjust the Solvency II calculations to achieve equilibrium. It is important that regulation is as risk-based as possible and that it promotes the principle of proportionality. Also, FIN-FSA published a supervised release on the management of disability risk allowed to pension insurance companies. This is important because companies were slipping past their authorized industry—that is, social insurance—in providing well-being services. FIN-FSA will continue to audit this matter this year to ensure that all companies operate within the regulatory framework.
Related Links
- Press Release
- Annual Report (PDF in Finnish)
- FIN-FSA Report to Parliamentary Supervisory Council 2019 (PDF in Finnish)
- Supervised Entities and Other Payers (PDF in Finnish)
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Banking, Pensions, Climate Change Risk, AML/CFT, ESG, Capital Requirements, Basel III, Solvency II, Annual Report, Fintech, FIN-FSA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Michael Denton, PhD, PE
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Related Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
