Poul Thomsen, Director of the IMF European Department spoke, at the “ECB and Its Watchers” Conference in Frankfurt, about the role of macro-prudential policies in maintaining financial stability. He highlighted that, while monetary policy is only available at the euro area-wide level, macro-prudential policies can closely target risks in specific national markets, thus contributing to reduce the heterogeneity in financial and business cycles across member states.
Mr. Thomsen pointed that macro-prudential authorities are now operational in every member state. If deemed necessary, the capital-based macro prudential tools can be “topped-up” by ECB, which also has macro-prudential responsibilities, in addition to its micro-prudential role. He opined and illustrated that "the EU macro-prudential framework would benefit from some simplification. Procedures to activate macro-prudential instruments are complex, involving many authorities at different levels." For example, a few countries—Austria, Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands—were alerted by the Risk Board in November 2016 about potential overvaluation in their housing markets and about rising household indebtedness. In response, most of these countries tightened prudential or borrower-based tools. However, in case of Belgium and Finland, the activation of capital-based tools took more than six months. This indicates that, decision-making processes should be simplified to ensure that national authorities take timely action. He then informed the audience that IMF is "... developing concrete proposals in this regard."
Next, Mr. Thomsen discussed the use of macro-prudential policies to address concerns related to housing and corporate debt. With regard to corporate debt, he added that France is a recent example. In view of rising corporate debt in the country, the French macro-prudential authority is considering tightening the large exposure limit in big French banks for loans to highly indebted large nonfinancial corporations. Such measures will protect the banking sector against corporate defaults, if any. He, however, added that macro-prudential tools to target corporate credit need to be supplemented by other measures. For instance, the tax deductibility of interest payments in most corporate income tax systems, coupled with no such deductibility for equity financing, creates economic distortions and exacerbates leverage. One way to mitigate this debt bias is to provide a deduction for equity costs. Moreover, all countries have not yet legislated the borrower-based tools with harmonized definitions that are best suited to target specific risks and limit leakage. Experience at the IMF suggests that the problems that macro-prudential policy seeks to address are often caused by other real sector factors, and by “distortions” in other policy areas. He concludes that macro-prudential policies cannot be a substitute for addressing these underlying problems.
Related Link: Speech
Previous ArticleFED Releases Results of Supervisory Stress Tests for Banks
FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.
HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.
FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).
HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.
In a recent statistical notice, BoE announced publication of the reporting schedule for statistical returns for 2021.
EC welcomed the joint declaration by 25 EU member states on building the next generation of cloud in Europe.
MAS published amendments to Notice 648 on the issuance of covered bonds by banks incorporated in Singapore.
FDIC has selected 14 technology companies—including Accenture Federal Services, LLC, Fed Reporter, Inc, and S&P Global Market Intelligence, LLC—for inclusion in the next phase of the rapid prototyping competition.
GLEIF announced that financial institutions worldwide can realize a variety of cost, efficiency, and customer experience benefits by assuming a new “validation agent” role within the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) System.