ESMA has set out the implications of Brexit for credit rating agencies (CRAs) based in UK, including the endorsement of UK credit ratings, in case of a no-deal Brexit. In a no-deal Brexit scenario, UK-based CRAs will no longer meet the conditions for registration and their registrations will be withdrawn changing their status to third-country CRAs. In this event, the outstanding credit ratings of UK-based CRAs will only continue to be usable for regulatory purposes in EU if the credit ratings are endorsed by a CRA that is located in an EU member state (EU27 CRA).
Most UK-based CRAs have taken the necessary steps to prepare for the endorsement regime. An EU27 CRA must notify ESMA of its intention to endorse credit ratings from the UK-based CRA. ESMA supervises seven UK-based CRAs—AM Best Europe-Rating Services Ltd, DBRS Ratings Limited, Fitch Ratings Limited, Fitch Ratings CIS Limited, Moody’s Investors Service Ltd, Moody’s Investors Service EMEA Ltd, and The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. As of March 15, 2019, all UK-based CRAs, except The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd, have taken steps to ensure that an EU27 CRA is willing and able to endorse its credit ratings in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
For a credit rating issued by a third-country CRA to be endorsed by an EU27 CRA, the CRA Regulation requires a set of strict conditions to be met. Some of these conditions relate to the legal and supervisory framework in the third country while other conditions relate to the EU27 and third-country CRAs that wish to make use of the endorsement regime. ESMA has completed an assessment of the legal and supervisory framework for CRAs foreseen by the UK statutory instrument 226 of February 13, 2019, which will take effect on the date of Brexit, in a no-deal Brexit scenario. It is also a condition for endorsement that ESMA has a cooperation agreement with the supervisory authority of the UK. This condition is met by the memorandum of understanding that was agreed on February 01, 2019 and will take effect on the date of Brexit, in a no-deal Brexit scenario.
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, Brexit, No-Deal Brexit, CRA Regulation, EU27 CRA, UK-Based CRA, CRA, ESMA
Previous ArticleBDE Releases Technical Instructions for Reporting by Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.