APRA published a frequently asked question (FAQ) on its expectations for historical rate rollovers on non-foreign exchange contracts in the context of APS 180, which is the prudential standard on capital adequacy for counterparty credit risk exposures. Under paragraph 17 of APS 180, the historical rate rollovers are permitted only on foreign exchange contracts and not on non-foreign-exchange transactions. APRA is currently considering this position, including potentially some limited flexibility for authorized deposit taking institutions in certain circumstances to transact historical rate rollovers on non-foreign exchange contracts where APRA is comfortable with the oversight, limits, risk assessment, and controls. This could include cases where the underlying transaction has been delayed and there is a clear expectation of delivery in the short term. APRA will assess the transactions and consider an adjustment to APS 180 on a case-by-case basis, for individual institutions.
In another development, APRA closed its investigation into the possible breaches of the Banking Act 1959, including Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR), by Westpac Banking Corporation. However, Westpac remains subject to a court enforceable undertaking to implement an integrated risk governance remediation plan to uplift risk governance across its business, with ongoing independent review over its progress. The $1 billion operational risk capital add-on, which reflects the heightened operational risk profile of the bank, will also remain in place until Westpac completes remediation, under the court enforceable undertaking, to the satisfaction of APRA.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, FAQ, BEAR, Westpac, Historical Rate Rollovers, APS 180, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Derivatives, APRA
Previous ArticleBCB Proposes Sustainability Criteria for Granting Rural Credit
The UK authorities have published consultations with respect to the Basel requirements for banks. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the consultation paper CP16/22 on rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards.
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a joint report that outlines the initial findings from climate scenario analyses undertaken by financial authorities to assess climate-related financial risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 leaders, highlighting the work that it will undertake under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023 to strengthen resilience of the financial system.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The European Union has finalized and published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a set of 13 Delegated and Implementing Regulations applicable to the European crowdfunding service providers.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.