OFR published a working paper on market-making costs and liquidity with respect to credit default swaps (CDS) market. The paper examines whether liquidity deteriorated in the single-name CDS market due to regulatory reforms after the 2007-09 financial crisis. It finds evidence of both increased spreads and lower volumes, consistent with the reforms increasing the cost of market-making for bank-dealers. It also finds that transaction prices between dealers and clients have become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers as interdealer trade has declined.
The paper contributes to three separate strands of literature: on the market structure of bilateral markets and the behavior of dealers; the potential impact of the financial crisis reforms on market liquidity; and the empirical literature on inventory management and pricing by dealers, specifically for the single-name CDS markets. The paper provides background on the CDS markets and highlights the reforms that may have potentially influenced the behavior of CDS market participants—the Basel 2.5 and Basel III accords, rules requiring standardized financial contracts be cleared through central counterparties, the Volcker rule, the rules on margin requirements for bilateral transactions, and other rules, including the single counterparty credit limit rule.
In over-the-counter (OTC) markets, dealers facilitate trading by becoming market makers. The costs dealers face, including the cost of holding inventory on balance sheet, and the ease, or difficulty, of reducing their positions, determine the degree of liquidity they provide. A stylized model has been used to examine the implications of these costs on dealer behavior and market liquidity. The model is used to guide an empirical study of the single name CDS market between 2010-2016. It is found that transaction prices between dealers and clients have progressively become more dependent on the inventories of individual dealers rather than on the aggregate inventory across all dealers. It has also been found that the volume between clients and dealers decreases across all clients, with larger declines for clients that are depository institutions. Meanwhile, the volume of inter-dealer trades decreases, dealer inventories decline, and dealers with large inventories are more likely to trade with clients. These results are consistent with the view that regulatory reforms implemented following the 2007-09 financial crisis increased the cost of holding inventory for dealers and the cost of inter-dealer trading. While the results indicate that increased costs in the CDS markets have impacted liquidity provision, it cannot be ruled out that this was the intent of the reforms. To determine the socially optimal level of trading activity, it would be necessary to quantify both the benefits and costs of the level of trading. This remains an open question, both theoretically and empirically, for future research.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Credit Default Swap, Liquidity, Market-Making Cost, Basel III, OTC Market, Regulatory Reform, OFR
Previous ArticleBCBS Updates Basel III Monitoring Workbook, Instructions, and FAQs
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting