Featured Product

    PRA Publishes Draft Version of XBRL Taxonomy for Banks

    March 10, 2021

    PRA published a public working draft of Version 3.4.0 of the banking XBRL taxonomy, along with the related technical artefacts. This version of the taxonomy is intended to support collection of Capital+, financial statements, and ring-fencing reporting. The taxonomy, data point model (DPM) dictionary, annotated templates, and validation rules represent the requirements within the consultation paper CP5/21 on implementation of Basel standards. PRA is inviting feedback, particularly from firms and software vendors, by May 03, 2021. This public working draft should not be used for reporting. PRA aims to publish the final version of the taxonomy and DPM by July 2021.

    The taxonomy is aligned to the EBA Taxonomy 3.0 Phase 1 and PRA will adopt the EBA filing rules as published on the EBA website. In cases of minor discrepancies compared to the templates in the PRA Rulebook, PRA has consulted and will finalize the corresponding amendments to the PRA Rulebook templates at a later date. The release notes detail the changes introduced in this public working draft of the taxonomy and contain tables listing the changed and unchanged entry points. The notes state that table codes for Financial Statements reporting have been amended within this update to ensure a common pattern for table codes is used across all frameworks. To align an additional element was added to the Financial Statements table codifications. Within Taxonomy 3.0, EBA has moved to four-digit codes for some reporting templates by adding a leading zero. Where the base EBA template has seen this amendment, four-digit codes have also been reflected in the BoE taxonomy 3.4.0 public working draft. The template FS 701.00.02 has been restructured to improve the way the data modeling principles have been applied.

    Additionally, BoE has refined the data model and taxonomy generation processes to ensure updates are made in a robust and automated manner. This public working draft has been produced using these refined generation processes; thus, there are some cosmetic differences in the outputs being published. Key differences are outlined below: 

    • Additions, deletions, and modifications are no longer highlighted according to the previous color convention. Instead, this information is provided in the new change log being published and this includes increased traceability on changes made to validation rules.
    • Within the data dictionary, the domain owner has been added as a prefix to the worksheet names.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: May 03, 2021

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Reporting, DPM, Taxonomy, Version 3.4.0, Capital+, Ring Fencing, Validation Rules, Basel, Taxonomy 3.0, EBA, BoE, PRA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness

    APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance

    The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.

    November 30, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules

    Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR

    EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability

    The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7751