HKMA published sound practices on the management of risks associated with algorithmic trading by the authorized institutions. These practices are based on the results of an HKMA survey from 2018 and a round of thematic onsite examinations conducted in 2019. The survey on algorithmic trading suggested that algorithmic trading may become more prevalent in the banking industry. Thus, HKMA considers it useful to set out its supervisory expectations around algorithmic trading and share the sound practices observed during the thematic examinations with all authorized institutions.
Authorized institutions engaged in algorithmic trading activities are expected to give due consideration to these supervisory expectations and sound practices when developing their risk management framework, having regard to the nature, scale, and complexity of their algorithmic trading activities. Some of these sound practices have been adopted by the more advanced institutions, as observed by HKMA in the thematic examinations. Seven authorized institutions, mainly international banks using algorithms for making investment decisions, were covered in the thematic examinations. The objective of the examinations was to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk management practices of authorized institutions in relation to algorithmic trading activities, including governance and oversight, development and testing of algorithms, and risk monitoring and controls. The sound practices set out by HKMA cover the following areas:
- Proper governance and risk management frameworks, effective and independent control function, regular reviews of algorithms and relevant governance and controls, and regular internal audit reviews
- Effective framework governing development and testing of algorithms and robust algorithm approval policy and procedures
- Comprehensive and prudent pre-trade controls, robust post-trade controls, proper kill functionality to suspend trading, effective business continuity arrangements, adequate controls on access rights, and robust incident-handling policy and procedures
- Proper documentation for audit trials and comprehensive inventory of algorithms
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Algorithmic Trading, Governance, Sound Practices, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, HKMA
Previous ArticleGLEIF Updates Information on Global Regulatory Use of LEI
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.