HKMA published sound practices on the management of risks associated with algorithmic trading by the authorized institutions. These practices are based on the results of an HKMA survey from 2018 and a round of thematic onsite examinations conducted in 2019. The survey on algorithmic trading suggested that algorithmic trading may become more prevalent in the banking industry. Thus, HKMA considers it useful to set out its supervisory expectations around algorithmic trading and share the sound practices observed during the thematic examinations with all authorized institutions.
Authorized institutions engaged in algorithmic trading activities are expected to give due consideration to these supervisory expectations and sound practices when developing their risk management framework, having regard to the nature, scale, and complexity of their algorithmic trading activities. Some of these sound practices have been adopted by the more advanced institutions, as observed by HKMA in the thematic examinations. Seven authorized institutions, mainly international banks using algorithms for making investment decisions, were covered in the thematic examinations. The objective of the examinations was to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk management practices of authorized institutions in relation to algorithmic trading activities, including governance and oversight, development and testing of algorithms, and risk monitoring and controls. The sound practices set out by HKMA cover the following areas:
- Proper governance and risk management frameworks, effective and independent control function, regular reviews of algorithms and relevant governance and controls, and regular internal audit reviews
- Effective framework governing development and testing of algorithms and robust algorithm approval policy and procedures
- Comprehensive and prudent pre-trade controls, robust post-trade controls, proper kill functionality to suspend trading, effective business continuity arrangements, adequate controls on access rights, and robust incident-handling policy and procedures
- Proper documentation for audit trials and comprehensive inventory of algorithms
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Algorithmic Trading, Governance, Sound Practices, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, HKMA
Previous ArticleGLEIF Updates Information on Global Regulatory Use of LEI
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms, under the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published version 5.1 of the filing rules for supervisory reporting.
The European Central Bank (ECB) Guideline 2021/1829 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data has been published in the Official Journal of European Union.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published the prudential practice guide CPG 511 to assist banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees in meeting requirements of CPS 511, the new prudential standard on remuneration.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published a bulletin that provides an updated self-assessment tool for banks to evaluate their preparedness for cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that examines the progress made toward disclosures aligned with recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published the progress report on adoption of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) has implemented, in its information system, updates linked to the Data Point Model (DPM) version 3.1.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a thematic note that aims to identify and raise awareness of the transition risks of benchmark rates, as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Overnight Index Average (EONIA) are close to being phased out.
In a letter to the federally regulated financial institutions and pension plans, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published a summary of the feedback received to the January 2021 discussion paper on ways to address climate risks.