The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks. This follows an independent ring-fencing regime review, which concluded that the resolution regime offers a more comprehensive solution to addressing the problems of "too big to fail" and recommended that the government should consider these practicalities.
This Call for Evidence represents the first stage of the government response to this recommendation. It seeks views on the ongoing benefits that ring-fencing provides to financial stability not found elsewhere in the regulatory framework and on the steps that could be taken to better align the ring-fencing and resolution regimes without losing financial stability benefits. The Call for Evidence invites respondents to consider a wide range of options for the longer-term future of ring-fencing. The government is proposing to use the below criteria and welcomes views of stakeholders on their appropriateness:
- Impact on financial stability. On criteria revolves around assessment of the impact on the ability of the Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to promote their objectives, including to ensure the continuity of critical economic functions. This would include the clarity of supervisors’ understanding of firms’ operations and thus their ability to identify and manage risks to financial stability at an early stage as well as the likelihood of public funds being required to be deployed in support of a failed bank.
- Impact on firms. The next criteria entails examination of the costs each option impose on, or alleviate for, firms. Would firms be likely to materially change existing organizational structures? Would some options provide more or less regulatory certainty? It should be noted that the use of existing regulatory powers to replicate identified material benefits of ring-fencing may impose new and significant costs on firms and would need to be carefully considered. The government intends to draw on responses to Q3 in considering this impact.
- Impact on UK competitiveness and growth. Another criteria involves understanding the effect of each option on the attractiveness of the UK relative to other jurisdictions as a financial services hub and the ability of firms to support economic growth in the UK.
- Impact on competition. The extent to which each option diminishes or strengthens the ability of individual firms to compete with each other in the interest of UK consumers should also be considered.
Once this Call for Evidence has closed, the government, working with BoE and PRA through the Ring-Fencing Taskforce, will undertake detailed analysis of the received responses. This analysis will serve to inform the development of an initial policy position regarding the long-term future of the ring-fencing regime. The government will then issue its response to the Call for Evidence and set out next steps.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Resolution Framework, Ring-Fencing, Basel, Too Big to Fail, PRA, HM Treasury
Previous ArticleGerman Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.