MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper covers operational risks associated with outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, along with risks in the areas of information/data governance, cybersecurity, fraud and staff misconduct, and legal and regulatory compliance. The paper shares good practices adopted by financial institutions to mitigate such risks and encourages institutions to adopt these risk-mitigation practices on a risk-proportionate basis, according to their risk profiles and business activities. The mitigation practices set out in the paper are also applicable to non-bank financial institutions.
The paper predominantly focuses on the areas of risks where changes, due to remote working, have a direct impact on the risks and risk management challenges faced by financial institutions (referred to as direct risks). However, poorly managed direct risks of remote working could lead to heightened risks in areas that may not be directly impacted by remote working (referred to as indirect risks). The paper provides examples of indirect credit, market, and reputational risks. For instance, changes in validation processes that are conducted for credit assessment and monitoring purposes, such as replacement of customer site visits (for example, to ascertain existence of collateral pledged) with customer calls, could affect the ability of a financial institution to identify red flags in customer circumstances. The paper sets out the key actions that financial institutions are encouraged to adopt to manage remote working risks and these actions include the following:
- With respect to establishing appropriate internal control mechanisms, financial institutions are encouraged to implement compensating controls to manage identified risks within risk appetite statements approved by Board and senior management. Financial institutions are also encouraged to adopt robust change management procedures so that staff members understand and implement the new processes and controls as intended.
- With respect to outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, financial institutions should evaluate changes to vendor risk profiles with remote working, such as by assessing vendors’ remote working controls and operational resilience. Financial institutions should also implement appropriate safeguards and contingency plans to ensure continuity of services.
- For appropriate data/information governance, financial institutions should assess the risks and implications of information loss when determining which activities can be performed remotely. Financial institutions need to strengthen preventive and detective controls to mitigate these risks.
- To mitigate cyber risk, financial institutions are encouraged to implement controls to ensure that remote working infrastructure of staff, including personal devices, are secured. Financial institutions should also continue to adopt sound and robust technology risk management practices, to manage hardware and software deployed to facilitate large-scale remote working, including during the pandemic.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Operational Risk, Operational Resilience, Technology Risk, Cyber Risk, Outsourcing Arrangements, Internal Controls, MAS
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).