MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper covers operational risks associated with outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, along with risks in the areas of information/data governance, cybersecurity, fraud and staff misconduct, and legal and regulatory compliance. The paper shares good practices adopted by financial institutions to mitigate such risks and encourages institutions to adopt these risk-mitigation practices on a risk-proportionate basis, according to their risk profiles and business activities. The mitigation practices set out in the paper are also applicable to non-bank financial institutions.
The paper predominantly focuses on the areas of risks where changes, due to remote working, have a direct impact on the risks and risk management challenges faced by financial institutions (referred to as direct risks). However, poorly managed direct risks of remote working could lead to heightened risks in areas that may not be directly impacted by remote working (referred to as indirect risks). The paper provides examples of indirect credit, market, and reputational risks. For instance, changes in validation processes that are conducted for credit assessment and monitoring purposes, such as replacement of customer site visits (for example, to ascertain existence of collateral pledged) with customer calls, could affect the ability of a financial institution to identify red flags in customer circumstances. The paper sets out the key actions that financial institutions are encouraged to adopt to manage remote working risks and these actions include the following:
- With respect to establishing appropriate internal control mechanisms, financial institutions are encouraged to implement compensating controls to manage identified risks within risk appetite statements approved by Board and senior management. Financial institutions are also encouraged to adopt robust change management procedures so that staff members understand and implement the new processes and controls as intended.
- With respect to outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, financial institutions should evaluate changes to vendor risk profiles with remote working, such as by assessing vendors’ remote working controls and operational resilience. Financial institutions should also implement appropriate safeguards and contingency plans to ensure continuity of services.
- For appropriate data/information governance, financial institutions should assess the risks and implications of information loss when determining which activities can be performed remotely. Financial institutions need to strengthen preventive and detective controls to mitigate these risks.
- To mitigate cyber risk, financial institutions are encouraged to implement controls to ensure that remote working infrastructure of staff, including personal devices, are secured. Financial institutions should also continue to adopt sound and robust technology risk management practices, to manage hardware and software deployed to facilitate large-scale remote working, including during the pandemic.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Operational Risk, Operational Resilience, Technology Risk, Cyber Risk, Outsourcing Arrangements, Internal Controls, MAS
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.