PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervising Liquidity and Funding Risks
PRA published the policy statement PS4/20 that contains the updated supervisory statement (SS24/15) on its approach to supervising liquidity and funding risks (Appendix 1). PS4/20 provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP27/19, which contained proposals to update the SS24/15. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorized UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated UK investment firms. The PS4/20 comes into effect on its date of publication.
In October 2019, BoE published the Market Operations Guide of BoE, outlining the framework for operations in sterling money markets. To reflect the Market Operations Guide and reiterate the relevant expectations set out in SS9/17 on recovery planning, PRA consulted on changes to SS24/15. The consultation closed on November 17, 2019. PRA received three responses to the CP27/19. Respondents generally welcomed the PRA proposals, while requesting some clarifications and suggesting limited changes to the proposals. The details of these responses, along the feedback and final decisions of PRA, have been set out in Chapter 2 of the policy statement.
In CP27/19, PRA had proposed that:
- There should be no presumptive order in which firms should use the BoE liquidity facilities, including the Discount Window Facility (DWF), or draw down their own liquid asset buffers to meet a liquidity need. Firms would be expected to use their own judgement in applying for and using the liquidity facilities of BoE.
- The PRA expectations from firms that have been set out in SS9/17 also apply with regard to the use of the central bank facilities as outlined in SS24/15. The proposals reiterated that recovery options should be credible, including where these involve the use of central bank facilities.
The policy set out in PS4/20 has been designed in the context of the withdrawal of UK from EU and entry into the transition period, during which time the UK remains subject to European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with the EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the policy would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Related Links
Effective Date: March 02, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Liquidity Risk, Market Operations Guide, Recovery Planning, CP27/19, SS24/15, PS4/20, BoE, PRA
Featured Experts
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Previous Article
OSFI Consults on Instruction Guide for Termination of Pension PlanRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
