General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
March 02, 2018

Andreas Dombret of Bundesbank spoke—at the second Regional Banking Conference of the State of Hesse in Brussels—about the prospects for, and obstacles to, greater proportionality in banking regulation. He examined regulatory proportionality from the perspective of a supervisor and outlined what greater proportionality in the EU might look like.

Dr. Dombret discussed the need for greater proportionality in the context of Basel III reforms, which have made regulatory implementation of increasingly complex rules harder for smaller and medium-size institutions. He outlined three principles that need to govern treatment of this issue: financial stability must remain the primary concern, all relief measures must conform to the principle of equal treatment, and treatment should target the day-to-day burden for institutions with low-risk business models (easing of solvency or liquidity rules is out of the question). Within this outlined framework, new treatments are providing considerable scope for banking regulation that is more proportionate for, and thus more reconcilable with, smaller and less complex institutions. He discussed the work of EC and European Parliament in this area, also mentioning that the proposals for eased requirements in the areas of disclosure and reporting are "highly extensive" and a "very welcome development." He also added that he regrets that a general approach—such as the small banking box—was rejected. 

He outlined two potential ways of improving proportionality either by taking a small-scale approach and introducing simplifications and exceptions for individual rules or by creating a whole new framework tailored to small banks and low-risk institutions. The second solution would be further-reaching and clear cut. However, the majority in Europe seems to "favor the small-scale solution." The emphasis must be on "reducing the administrative workload and minimizing the red tape," said Dr. Dombret. To this end, the measures being reviewed include exceptions to disclosure requirements, reductions in the granularity of reporting requirements, and a simplified form of the net stable funding ratio. However, he emphasized the importance of fully implementing the recently finalized Basel III package in the EU and added that, "no concessions can be made, in particular, when it comes to the risk-weighted capital ratio, the leverage ratio, or the short-term liquidity coverage ratio." However, full implementation of Basel III rules does not mean that all banks need to be affected by these highly complex rules to the same extent. Member countries of the Basel Committee are free to apply other rules to smaller banks that are only active in their own home markets and do not pose a threat to international financial stability. This is the framework that should be largely used when revising the EU rules.

In terms of the review of the trading book, Bundesbank favors retaining the simple, standardized approaches currently in place for small institutions with small trading books. Dr. Dombret states that the new, complex standardized approach is good for institutions that engage in substantial trading activity but it is not suited to locally based savings banks or people's banks. He added that Bundesbank supports the idea of EC and the European Parliament to exclude development banks from the scope of the CRD/CRR regulatory framework. "Given, above all, the particularities of the business models of German development banks and their public mandate, I fail to see why these institutions should be subject to complex international regulation.... We are also calling for institutions with total assets in excess of USD 30 billion to be covered by an exemption." He concludes that when implementing the Basel III reforms in the EU, the rules must be applied in full to internationally active banks. However, in case of smaller banks that are not internationally active, the focus should be on reducing the operational burden by scaling back or removing inappropriately complex rules on checking whether it would be possible to exempt entire groups of institutions such as development banks from the European regulation. It is now up to the European Parliament, the EU Council of Ministers, and EC to pave the way for substantial improvements.


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Proportionality, Basel III, Financial Stability, Bundesbank, BCBS

Related Insights
News

US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCR

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.

February 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing Rule

FED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019

EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of Fintech

FSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECL

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Issues Correction in Historical Dataset in its 2019 Stress Tests

FED identified an error in the historical dataset used in its 2019 stress tests and issued a correction.

February 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Consults on Company-Run Stress Test Requirements for Banks

OCC proposed amendments to its company-run stress testing requirements for national banks and Federal savings associations, consistent with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CFTC Extends Comment Periods for Trade Execution Requirement Proposals

CFTC announced that it is extending comment period for the proposed amendments related to the regulations on swap execution facilities (SEF) and trade execution requirement.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Updates Instructions for Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS updated instructions for Basel III monitoring for the collection of December 2018 data from the participating banks.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Proposes to Renew Information Collection Under Stress Test Rule

OCC is proposing to renew its information collection titled “Annual Stress Test Rule” (OMB Control No: 1557-0311). Comments must be received on or before March 13, 2019.

February 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2603