Featured Product

    FSB Issues Thematic Peer Review on Bank Resolution Planning

    June 04, 2018

    FSB launched the third thematic peer review on resolution regimes for banks. The review aims to evaluate implementation, by FSB jurisdictions, of the resolution planning standard set out in the FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions and in associated guidance in relation to banks. The Key Attributes are the international standard on resolution regimes and form a key component of the FSB policy framework to address the risks associated with institutions that are too-big-to-fail. As part of this review, FSB is seeking feedback from stakeholders by July 04, 2018.

    The Summary Terms of Reference on the peer review provide more details on the objectives, scope, and process for this review. The aim of the peer review is to:

    • Evaluate progress in the adoption of requirements for bank resolution planning and resolvability assessments since the second (March 2016) resolution peer review
    • Take stock of resolution planning practices in FSB jurisdictions for domestically incorporated banks that could be systemically significant or critical if they fail, focusing in particular on banks other than G-SIBs
    • Highlight the range of practices and lessons of experience on bank resolution planning, including any challenges arising from implementation
    • Identify jurisdictions’ approaches to resolution planning for banks that could be systemic in failure, including how proportionality considerations are reflected in resolution planning for those banks
    • Identify material inconsistencies or gaps that are common across jurisdictions and make recommendations to address them to promote effective implementation

    The peer review report, which is expected to be published in the first half of 2019, will describe the resolution planning frameworks and practices in FSB jurisdictions, including the progress since the second resolution peer review. It will describe the steps that those jurisdictions have taken as part of resolution planning to develop resolution strategies, implement resolution plans, and address barriers to resolvability, also highlighting differences in approaches across jurisdictions and by types of banks that could be systemic in failure. Progress in implementation of resolution planning requirements and the development of resolution plans will be illustrated with examples of different practices and the identification of areas where more work may be needed.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: July 04, 2018

    Keywords: International, Banking, Resolution Planning, Thematic Review, Peer Review, Systemic Risk, FSB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee Measures

    EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS, SNB, and SIX Announce Successful Completion of CBDC POC

    The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Sets Out Treatment of Certain Banking Book Positions Under FRTB

    EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on Integrating Climate Change into SII Standard Formula

    EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Issues Corrigenda to Investment Firms Directive and Regulation

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Proposes Changes to Rules Arising from Banking Amendment Act

    MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA to Elaborate on Approach to Transposition of CRD5 by Mid-December

    PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    RBNZ Consults on Aspects of Insurance Act, Solvency Standards & IFRS17

    RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Sets Out Work Program for 2021-2023

    SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on KPIs on Sustainability for Non-Financial Reporting

    EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6191