Featured Product

    FSB Issues Thematic Peer Review on Bank Resolution Planning

    June 04, 2018

    FSB launched the third thematic peer review on resolution regimes for banks. The review aims to evaluate implementation, by FSB jurisdictions, of the resolution planning standard set out in the FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions and in associated guidance in relation to banks. The Key Attributes are the international standard on resolution regimes and form a key component of the FSB policy framework to address the risks associated with institutions that are too-big-to-fail. As part of this review, FSB is seeking feedback from stakeholders by July 04, 2018.

    The Summary Terms of Reference on the peer review provide more details on the objectives, scope, and process for this review. The aim of the peer review is to:

    • Evaluate progress in the adoption of requirements for bank resolution planning and resolvability assessments since the second (March 2016) resolution peer review
    • Take stock of resolution planning practices in FSB jurisdictions for domestically incorporated banks that could be systemically significant or critical if they fail, focusing in particular on banks other than G-SIBs
    • Highlight the range of practices and lessons of experience on bank resolution planning, including any challenges arising from implementation
    • Identify jurisdictions’ approaches to resolution planning for banks that could be systemic in failure, including how proportionality considerations are reflected in resolution planning for those banks
    • Identify material inconsistencies or gaps that are common across jurisdictions and make recommendations to address them to promote effective implementation

    The peer review report, which is expected to be published in the first half of 2019, will describe the resolution planning frameworks and practices in FSB jurisdictions, including the progress since the second resolution peer review. It will describe the steps that those jurisdictions have taken as part of resolution planning to develop resolution strategies, implement resolution plans, and address barriers to resolvability, also highlighting differences in approaches across jurisdictions and by types of banks that could be systemic in failure. Progress in implementation of resolution planning requirements and the development of resolution plans will be illustrated with examples of different practices and the identification of areas where more work may be needed.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: July 04, 2018

    Keywords: International, Banking, Resolution Planning, Thematic Review, Peer Review, Systemic Risk, FSB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    MAS Amends Notice 610 on Reporting Templates for Banks in Singapore

    MAS published amendments to Notices 610 and 1003 related to submission of statistics and returns, along with the reporting templates and frequently asked questions (FAQs) associated with these Notices.

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Updates Policy Module on Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is issuing, by notice in the Gazette, revised versions of two Supervisory Policy Manual modules as statutory guidelines under section 7(3) of the Banking Ordinance. The Supervisory Policy Manual modules are CA-G-5 on “Supervisory Review Process” and SB-2 on “Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading.”

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Amends Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

    PRA published the policy statement PS2/20 that contains the final amendments to the Pillar 2 framework and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP5/19 on updates related to Pillar 2 capital framework.

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Survey Examines Progress of Central Banks Toward Digital Currency

    BIS published a paper that presents the results of a survey that asked central banks how their plans are developing in the area of central bank digital currency (CBDC).

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Revise Information Collection Under Market Risk Rule

    FED proposed to revise and extend, for three years, FR 4201, which is the information collection under the market risk capital rule.

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Stay Rules on Financial Contracts Under FIRO

    HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628).

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Notices on Minimum Liquid Asset Requirements for Banks

    MAS published amendments to Notices 1015, 613, and 649 related to the minimum liquid assets (MLA) requirements.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Submission on Fintech and Regtech

    APRA published its submission, to the Senate Select Committee, on financial technology and regulatory technology.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI to Implement Operational Risk Capital Rules for Banks in Q1 2022

    OSFI decided to move domestic implementation of the revised Basel III operational risk capital requirements from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Consults on Guideline on Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a draft guideline, along with the frequently asked questions (FAQs), on the definition of the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4541