EBA Responds to EC Consultation on Digital Finance Strategy for Europe
EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe. The response stresses that EBA is committed to securing technology neutrality in regulatory and supervisory approaches and strongly supports the EC initiative toward the new Digital Finance Strategy. EBA supports the proposed initiatives of EC and identifies additional actions to develop a high-level artificial intelligence principle-based framework, support the scaling of regtech and suptech initiatives, and facilitate "machine readability" and the standardization of concepts, definitions, and reporting obligations across EU financial services legislation. EBA looks forward to the publication of the Digital Finance Strategy and stands ready to play its role in optimizing the EU Single Market for digital finance.
EC had published its consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe in April 2020. The consultation built on the outcome of work carried out in accordance with the March 2018 Fintech Action Plan, including the actions undertaken by EBA pursuant to its Fintech Roadmap. In its response, EBA has identified a wide range of possible EU-level actions to support the cross-border scaling of innovative technology while ensuring high standards of consumer protection and financial sector resilience. EBA supports proposed enhancements to coordination mechanisms, such as EBA’s Fintech Knowledge Hub and the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF), to facilitate a stronger dialog between industry and regulatory and supervisory authorities on innovation-related issues. EBA agrees with the focus of EC on:
- Ensuring that the EU financial services regulatory framework is fit for the digital age
- Enabling consumers and firms to reap the opportunities offered by the EU-wide Single Market for digital financial services
- Promoting a data-driven financial sector for the benefit of EU consumers and firms
- Strengthening digital operational resilience
Toward these goals, EBA supports the actions identified by EC. EBA underscores the need for work on a high-level artificial intelligence principle-based framework as an appropriate foundation for the wider use of artificial intelligence in the financial services. EBA sets out a three-step approach to facilitate a common approach to the use of regtech and support interoperability. EBA also identifies potential measures to facilitate the gathering of best practices and trends on suptech and promote or facilitate the (collective) development of selected specific suptech use cases where there is a role for EBA in acting as a center for excellence and networking to help instigate scalable suptech across the Single Market. Finally, EBA emphasizes the potential of fintech in facilitating structural changes in the financial sector, including by supporting new business models. As new business models emerge (for example, ecosystems for stablecoins), new supervisory models may be needed to ensure effective oversight of applicable regulatory measures such as governance, operational resilience, and consumer protection requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Fintech, Regtech, Suptech, Digital Finance Strategy, Reporting, Machine-Readable Regulations, Basel, EC, EBA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
IOSCO Publishes Good Practices on Processes for DeferenceRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
