EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe. The response stresses that EBA is committed to securing technology neutrality in regulatory and supervisory approaches and strongly supports the EC initiative toward the new Digital Finance Strategy. EBA supports the proposed initiatives of EC and identifies additional actions to develop a high-level artificial intelligence principle-based framework, support the scaling of regtech and suptech initiatives, and facilitate "machine readability" and the standardization of concepts, definitions, and reporting obligations across EU financial services legislation. EBA looks forward to the publication of the Digital Finance Strategy and stands ready to play its role in optimizing the EU Single Market for digital finance.
EC had published its consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe in April 2020. The consultation built on the outcome of work carried out in accordance with the March 2018 Fintech Action Plan, including the actions undertaken by EBA pursuant to its Fintech Roadmap. In its response, EBA has identified a wide range of possible EU-level actions to support the cross-border scaling of innovative technology while ensuring high standards of consumer protection and financial sector resilience. EBA supports proposed enhancements to coordination mechanisms, such as EBA’s Fintech Knowledge Hub and the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF), to facilitate a stronger dialog between industry and regulatory and supervisory authorities on innovation-related issues. EBA agrees with the focus of EC on:
- Ensuring that the EU financial services regulatory framework is fit for the digital age
- Enabling consumers and firms to reap the opportunities offered by the EU-wide Single Market for digital financial services
- Promoting a data-driven financial sector for the benefit of EU consumers and firms
- Strengthening digital operational resilience
Toward these goals, EBA supports the actions identified by EC. EBA underscores the need for work on a high-level artificial intelligence principle-based framework as an appropriate foundation for the wider use of artificial intelligence in the financial services. EBA sets out a three-step approach to facilitate a common approach to the use of regtech and support interoperability. EBA also identifies potential measures to facilitate the gathering of best practices and trends on suptech and promote or facilitate the (collective) development of selected specific suptech use cases where there is a role for EBA in acting as a center for excellence and networking to help instigate scalable suptech across the Single Market. Finally, EBA emphasizes the potential of fintech in facilitating structural changes in the financial sector, including by supporting new business models. As new business models emerge (for example, ecosystems for stablecoins), new supervisory models may be needed to ensure effective oversight of applicable regulatory measures such as governance, operational resilience, and consumer protection requirements.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Fintech, Regtech, Suptech, Digital Finance Strategy, Reporting, Machine-Readable Regulations, Basel, EC, EBA
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.