APRA published a frequently asked question (FAQ) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on the regulatory capital treatment of loans issued under the federal government’s Family Home Guarantee (FHG) and First Home Loan Deposit Scheme (FHLDS) programs. The clarifications provided in the FAQ are relevant mainly for the authorized deposit-taking institutions that use the standardized approach to credit risk. The FAQ also clarifies the correct reporting approach for entities that use the standardized approach to credit risk under the reporting standard ARS 112.1 on on-balance sheet assets under the standardized credit risk approach the reporting standard ARS 223.0 on residential mortgage lending.
Under the standardized approach to credit risk, loans subject to the FHG and FHLDS may be treated in a comparable manner to the residential mortgage loans with a loan-to-valuation ratio of 80% and accordingly risk-weighted at 35%. This risk-weight must be applied to the total amount lent to the borrower. This risk-weight reflects the government guarantee and terms of the program. Once the government guarantee ceases to apply, authorized deposit-taking institutions must revert to calculating the regulatory capital requirement in line with the existing requirements of the prudential standard APS 112 on standardized approach to credit risk. For authorized deposit-taking institutions that use the internal ratings-based approach to credit risk, there are no adjustments to the capital treatment of loans subject to the FHG or FHLDS.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Credit Risk, Residential Mortgage, FHG, FHLDS, Regulatory Capital, Standardized Approach, Internal Ratings Based Approach, APS 112, APS 223.0, APRA
Previous ArticlePRA and FPC Propose Changes to Leverage Ratio Framework in UK
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a joint report that outlines the initial findings from climate scenario analyses undertaken by financial authorities to assess climate-related financial risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 leaders, highlighting the work that it will undertake under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023 to strengthen resilience of the financial system.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The European Union has finalized and published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a set of 13 Delegated and Implementing Regulations applicable to the European crowdfunding service providers.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.