IMF published a paper that took stock of the fintech experience in different countries, conducted in-depth review of selected fintech topics, and identified key fintech issues that merit further attention of the membership and international bodies. The paper found that, despite the important regional and national differences, countries were broadly embracing the opportunities of fintech to boost economic growth and inclusion, while balancing risks to stability and integrity.
Last year, IMF and World Bank Group approved the Bali Fintech Agenda, which lays out key issues to consider in how technological innovation is changing the provision of financial services with implications for economic efficiency and growth, financial stability, inclusion, and integrity. In approving the Agenda, IMF Executive Directors asked staff to review fintech developments and consider their implications within the mandates of IMF and World Bank. This paper is in response to this call and draws on discussions with country authorities on issues raised in the context of IMF surveillance and World Bank country work, the findings of a survey of the membership on their approach to the Bali Fintech Agenda, and deeper exploration on selected fintech topics by staff. It identified key areas for international cooperation––including roles for IMF and World Bank Group––and the areas in which further work is needed at the national level and by relevant international organizations and standard-setting bodies.
The IMF Directors agreed that several key policy issues would require heightened attention from national authorities and international bodies. These include managing competing policy priorities with the aim of harnessing the benefits of fintech while supporting competition and strengthening financial stability, financial integrity, and consumer protection. Directors also emphasized the importance of other priorities, including building regulatory capacity, strengthening cyber-security, and enhancing data frameworks. They took note of staff’s analysis on the need to develop new international standards or good practices to support countries in adapting their legal and regulatory frameworks, although some Directors did not see the need for new standards related to fintech beyond what is already under discussion in the relevant international fora.
The IMF staff conducted an in-depth review of selected fintech topics, including regulatory sandboxes, aspects of crypto-assets, payments and settlement systems (large value and retail), data frameworks, selected legal issues, institutional arrangements, and the central bank digital currency. Based on the review. the paper concludes that development of international standards or good practices by standard-setting bodies is an urgent issue. This will help many countries adapt their legal and regulatory frameworks to the new entrants that are increasingly becoming part of the intermediation and financial service delivery chain. The paper highlights that cyber-security is another widely considered key risk facing financial systems and fintech applications. The rising capabilities of cyber-attacks is creating a sense of urgency among public authorities to institute effective measures for cyber-security risk management and operational resiliency.
Related Link: Report
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Cyber Risk, Regtech, Crypto-Assets, Digital Currencies, Financial Stability, IMF
Previous ArticleHKMA Article Examines Public Money Recovery Arrangements Under FIRO
Next ArticleIAIS Publishes Newsletter for September 2019
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.