BCBS revised the leverage ratio disclosure requirements and the treatment of client cleared derivatives for calculating leverage ratio. Revisions to the disclosure requirements are intended to reduce excessive volatility in bank exposures around key reference dates. Both revisions will be applicable to the version of the leverage ratio standard that will come into effect on January 01, 2022.
The revised leverage ratio treatment of client cleared derivatives sets out a targeted revision of the leverage ratio measurement of client cleared derivatives to align it with the standardized approach to measuring counterparty credit risk exposures (SA-CCR). This treatment permits both cash and non-cash forms of segregated initial margin and cash and non-cash variation margin received from a client to offset the replacement cost and potential future exposure for client cleared derivatives only. This limited revision balances the robustness of the leverage ratio as a non-risk-based safeguard against unsustainable sources of leverage with the policy objective set by the G20 Leaders to promote central clearing of standardized derivative contracts. BCBS revised this treatment following its evaluation of the impact of the leverage ratio on banks' provision of client clearing services and the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative information on banks' exposures to client cleared derivatives.
The revisions to leverage ratio disclosure requirements set out additional requirements for banks to disclose their leverage ratios based on quarter-end and daily average values of securities financing transactions. A comparison of the two sets of values will allow market participants to better assess banks' actual leverage throughout the reporting period. BCBS has finalized this disclosure requirement to address concerns expressed in a newsletter published last year regarding the potential regulatory arbitrage by banks in the form of window-dressing. The concern was that temporary reductions of transaction volumes around reference dates result in the reporting and public disclosure of artificially elevated leverage ratios. BCBS will continue to carefully monitor the potential window-dressing behavior by banks. BCBS has also published revisions to the Pillar 3 disclosure templates and instructions that will serve to implement these revised disclosure requirements.
Keywords: International, Banking, Leverage Ratio, Derivatives, Pillar 1, Pillar 3, SA-CCR, Reporting, G20, Disclosures, Credit Risk, Window Dressing Behavior, Basel III, BCBS
Previous ArticlePRA Consults on Management of Prudential Risks on Asset Encumbrance
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.