The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) released results of the annual stress testing exercise for banks, along with a Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) Expected Loss Estimator (ELE) tool.
The CECL ELE is a spreadsheet-based tool that utilizes the loan-level data and management assumptions, as entered in by the financial institution management. The ELE tool provides automated calculations using the Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (WARM) method, one of many CECL methods accepted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The tool is intended to aid community financial institutions in calculating their CECL allowances. The launch of the ELE tool builds on the previous release of the Scaled CECL Allowance for Losses Estimator, or SCALE, tool. Together, the ELE and SCALE tools provide two simplified approaches to CECL calculations for smaller community financial institutions. Along with the tool, FED has also released the instructions and frequently asked questions (FAQs) on this tool. The ELE tool can be used as either a primary tool in the allowance for credit losses calculation or as a supplementary tool to existing CECL process. This tool provides fully viewable code and formulas to allow financial institutions to independently verify the ELE tool and adjust as deemed necessary by their management.
The 2022 stress test results show that banks continue to have strong capital levels, allowing them to continue lending to households and businesses during a severe recession. All banks tested remained above their minimum capital requirements, despite total projected losses of USD 612 billion. Under stress, the aggregate common equity capital ratio—which provides a cushion against losses—has been projected to decline by 2.7 percentage points to a minimum of 9.7%, which is still more than double the minimum requirement. This year's hypothetical scenario was tougher than the 2021 test, by design, and included a severe global recession with substantial stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets. This year, larger banks saw an increase of over USD 50 billion in losses compared to the 2021 test. A total of 34 banks participated in the stress test for 2022 compared to the 23 banks in 2021; therefore, the aggregate results reported for the 2022 stress test are not fully comparable with the 2021 stress test results. These stress tests evaluate the resilience of large banks by estimating their capital levels, losses, revenue, and expenses under hypothetical scenarios over nine future quarters. The individual bank results from the stress test will factor directly into a bank's capital requirements, mandating each bank to hold enough capital to survive a severe recession. If a bank does not stay above its capital requirements, it is subject to automatic restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.
- Press Release on 2022 Bank Stress Test Results
- 2022 Bank Stress Test Results (PDF)
- Press Release on Tool to Implement CECL
- ELE Tool (XLSM)
- ELE Tool Background and Instructions (PDF)
- ELE Tool FAQs (PDF)
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Stress Testing, Dodd Frank Act, Basel, Regulatory Capital, CECL, SCALE, ELE, Community Banks, FED, Accounting, IFRS 9, Allowance For Credit Losses, Warm Method, St Louis FED
Previous ArticleUK Treasury Sub-Committee Seeks Views on Strong and Simple Framework
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.