ECB Publishes Version 4.0.0 of SFRDP Taxonomy Package
ECB published version 4.0.0 of the SFRDP taxonomy package to be used by national competent authorities when submitting supervisory financial reporting data points (SFRDP) to ECB, in accordance with the Regulation 2020/605 on supervisory financial information. Along with the taxonomy package, ECB has published release notes, templates, XBRL filing information, and validation rules. The SFRDP XBRL taxonomy is an extension of the FINREP (FINREP 9) EBA XBRL taxonomy included in the EBA 2.8 framework release. It references the applicable tables of the EBA taxonomy, but limits their scope to the cells identified in the ECB Regulation. Additionally, ECB updated the list of additional supervisory data quality checks that are aimed at enhancing the quality of supervisory reporting data.
Similar to the EBA XBRL taxonomies, individual and consolidated modules have been defined in the ECB SFRDP XBRL taxonomy 4.0.0. The taxonomy package contains three modules: FINREP_2.9.1-DP (FINREP Reporting Data Points (IFRS 9), Consolidated National GAAP); FINREP_2.9.1-Ind-DP (FINREP Reporting Data Points (IFRS 9), Individual National GAAP); and FINREP_2.9.1-Ind-DP (FINREP Reporting Data Points (IFRS 9), Individual IFRS). The SFRDP taxonomy provides a uniform technical format for data collection, defining the data items, business concepts, relations, visualizations, and validation rules. The applicable validation rules from the referenced EBA XBRL taxonomy have been replicated in the SFRDP taxonomy and the suffix “_dp_xx” has been added to their codes. Their scope has been appropriately limited and the text of their error messages has been updated to correctly refer to the SFRDP tables. In addition, all applicable cross-table (that is, between original FINREP tables and the SFRDP tables) validation rules have been created and included in the taxonomy. Appropriate assertion set files and filing indicator preconditions have been added to the modules.
The document on XBRL filing information intends to provide national competent authorities with reporting instructions on the use of XBRL filing indicators in the relevant XBRL instance file submissions and the codes to be used on the file names for the relevant instances. On both topics, ECB has chosen to follow the existing rules and architecture defined by EBA. The document provides examples covering different scenarios of supervised entities required to report using the SFRDP taxonomy. Filing indicators are XBRL artefacts providing information about the units—typically the templates—that are being reported in a given XBRL instance file. Filing indicators also trigger the appropriate taxonomy validation rules. An instance must contain a filing indicator associated with each template the supervised entity is intending to report.
Related Links
- SFRDP Taxonomy
- SFRDP Taxonomy Package, Version 4.0.0 (ZIP)
- Release Notes (PDF)
- Templates (ZIP)
- XBRL Filing Information (PDF)
- Validation Rules, Version 4 (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Reporting, FINREP, Taxonomy 4.0.0, Framework 2.8, Validation Rules, SFRDP Taxonomy, IFRS 9, EBA, ECB
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Previous Article
HM Treasury Outlines Approach to Implement Prudential Regimes in UKRelated Articles
UK Government to Set Out Rules on Wind-down of Critical Benchmarks
HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks.
EIOPA Launches Stress Test for Insurance Sector in EU
EIOPA launched the 2021 stress test for the insurance sector in EU.
UK Authorities Publish Third Edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid
UK authorities jointly published the third edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid setting out the planned regulatory initiatives for the next 24 months.
EC Consults on Regulation on Non-Financial Sustainability Disclosures
EC is requesting feedback on the proposed Commission Delegated Regulation on the content, methodology, and presentation of information that large financial and non-financial undertakings should disclose about their environmentally sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation.
OSFI Outlines Prudential Policy Priorities for Coming Months
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
BIS Announces TechSprint on Innovative Green Finance Solutions
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
ACPR Publishes Version 1.0.0 of RUBA Taxonomy
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
EBA Proposed Regulatory Standards for Central Database on AML/CFT
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB Responds to EC Consultation on Crisis Management Framework
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO to Survey Market Participants on Margin Calls
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.
