IMF published a staff report that presents country experiences (in the form of case studies) with reforms to strengthen regulatory oversight of the Islamic banking sector. The report reviews experiences with, and the progress made, in adapting prudential, safety nets and resolution frameworks to the specifics of Islamic banking. The countries, for which detailed case studies have been undertaken, are Bahrain, Djibouti, Indonesia, Kenya, Kuwait, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.
This background paper is a supplement to the board paper on “Ensuring Financial Stability in Countries with Islamic Banking (IB) Sectors.” This assessment is expected to help identify common challenges that these countries face in reforming their regulatory frameworks and to distill best practices. The case studies broadly analyze the following information:
The scale, structure, and growth of the Islamic finance industry, to give an indication of the significance of the Islamic banking sector in the financial industries of the various countries
The corporate and balance sheet structures of the Islamic banks, to help identify financial stability risks that the Islamic banks are exposed to, including both standard banking risks and risks that are unique to the sector
The regulatory, governance, and supervisory frameworks as well as the supporting financial infrastructure for liquidity management, effective resolution, and deposit insurance, to provide insights on the extent to which countries have adapted their frameworks to the specifics of Islamic finance, to address the identified stability risks
Policy options and lessons for reform
The case studies highlight important, but uneven, progress in adapting the legal, regulatory, and supervisory frameworks to the specificities of Islamic banking. Shari’ah governance frameworks have been established in most countries and there has been an increase in the number of countries adopting centralized Shari’ah boards, albeit from a low base. Meanwhile, progress in adapting the prudential, consumer protection, liquidity management, safety nets, and resolution frameworks remains uneven across countries. Bahrain and Malaysia have made the most advances in systematically adapting their policy frameworks to Islamic finance, in line with standards issued by the Islamic Financial Services Board and the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.
Related Link: Staff Report (PDF)
Keywords: International, IMF, Banking, Islamic Banking, Shari'ah, Financial Stability, Regulatory Reforms
The Bank of England (BoE) published the Statistical Notice 2021/09 requiring additional information from firms and software vendors to assist in the onboarding and testing phases for migrating statistical reporting to the BEEDS portal.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the final rules on the Investment Firms Prudential Regime (IFPR) to streamline and simplify the prudential requirements for solo-regulated UK firms authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
The working groups of the Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF) published a second round of guides (or Session 2 guides), written by the industry for the industry, to help financial firms manage climate-related financial risks.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final Policy Statement PS24/21 that contains the new Non-Performing Exposures Securitization Part of the PRA Rulebook and an updated Supervisory Statement SS10/18 on the general requirements and capital framework with respect to securitizations.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published version 5.1 of the filing rules for supervisory reporting.
The European Central Bank (ECB) Guideline 2021/1829 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data has been published in the Official Journal of European Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms, under the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR).
The European Council adopted conclusions inviting the European Union (EU) and the member states to further develop the cybersecurity crisis management framework.
The European Commission (EC) adopted the work program for 2022.