FASB published a summary of the quarterly meeting of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC). The key topics discussed at the meeting include implementation of leases and segment reporting. FASAC members also provided their views on the FASB’s research project, focusing on the recent major standards including those on leases, hedging, and credit losses. Overall, the Council members expressed diverse views on the philosophy for effective dates for major projects. Council members encouraged FASB to consider the need for (and time lag associated with) staggered effective dates on a standard-by-standard basis, rather than establishing an inflexible time lag for private companies and others.
FASAC members participated in the first of a series of discussions on the FASB’s post-effective date assessment of costs and benefits of the leasing standard. This session focused on public companies’ initial and recurring costs of transitioning. Some Council members noted that, although adoption of the standard had an insignificant overall impact on some companies’ financial statements, the initial level of effort and cost to apply the standard was somewhat higher than originally anticipated, primarily because of needed systems changes or new systems.
Some members also commented on some of the benefits of adoption to their companies. These include better centralized processes to manage their leases, improved internal consistency of leases, and increased ability to manage an organization’s asset base and lease obligations. Expected recurring costs include costs to capture the required data, sustain internal controls, and preserve systems. Other members, particularly investors and users, are beginning to consider the resulting changes in companies’ financial statements and how those changes impact their analysis or models. Those members indicated that additional time is needed to assess the benefits of change in the leases standard. FASAC members also discussed implementation issues related to the incremental borrowing rate, certain disclosures, and related parties.
Finally, FASAC members discussed potential improvements to segment reporting disclosures, centering on the approach to requiring additional disclosure by reportable segment. Overall, FASAC members preferred a principles-based approach to requiring additional disclosure by reportable segment, due to the wide variety of industries. FASAC members, particularly investors and users, expressed support for that approach and explained that having consistency over time for an organization could be more useful than comparability between organizations.
Keywords: Americas, US, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IFRS 9, Hedging, Leases Standard, IFRS 16, Reporting, FASAC, FASB
Previous ArticleHKMA on Commencement of Regulatory Regime Under Insurance Ordinance
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.