ESMA Issues Response to IASB Draft on Interest Rate Benchmark Reform
ESMA published a letter to IASB as a response to the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. ESMA supports the IASB initiative to provide, in a staged approach, a timely response to the increasing level of uncertainty about the possible financial reporting impact of the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks. Additionally, ESMA issued a letter to European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the draft comment letter of EFRAG on the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. Appendices to the letters set out detailed comments on the exposure draft of IASB.
The response letter to IASB highlights the following key points:
- ESMA agrees with the proposals set out in the exposure draft to amend old and new standards on financial instruments, namely IAS 39 and IFRS 9. The proposals address the issues that affect the application of hedge accounting requirements in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative interest rate, by setting out well-specified exceptions to the relevant requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39.
- ESMA recommends that IASB should consider providing clarifications about limitations on the application of the proposed exceptions, which are included in the basis for conclusions of the exposure draft, as amendments to the accompanying authoritative guidance of both IFRS 9 and IAS 39. This would promote consistent application and facilitate both implementation and enforceability of the proposed changes.
- ESMA urges IASB to proceed rapidly toward finalization of the proposed amendments, so that they can be applicable for the preparation of the 2019 annual financial statements.
- ESMA concurs with IASB that there are other issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative benchmark as part of a second phase. ESMA highlighted that addressing these "post-replacement" accounting issues is urgent and, therefore, encourages IASB to address these aspects as soon as possible.
In the view of ESMA, the next phase of the proposed changes should consider and address issues that relate, among others, to the application of the guidance on de-recognition and modification of financial instruments, the implications for the determination of fair value, and the implications on hedge accounting of changes in the contractual terms and in the contractual documentation.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Europe, Accounting, Banking, IFRS 9, IAS 39, Financial Instruments, Hedge Accounting, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, IASB, ESMA
Featured Experts
Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Anna Krayn
CECL adoption expert; engagement manager for loss estimation, internal risk capability enhancement, and counterparty credit risk management
Related Articles
EC Rule on Contractual Recognition of Write Down and Conversion Powers
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
ECB to Consider Climate Risks When Reviewing Collateral Framework
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
APRA Issues Further Guidance on Application of Securitization Standard
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
SRB Provides Update on Approach to Prior Permissions Regime
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
APRA Publishes FAQs on Capital Treatment of Overseas Subsidiaries
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
EBA Finalizes Guidance to Assess Breaches of Large Exposure Limits
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
PRA Finalizes Changes to Consolidated Prudential Rules Under CRD5/CRR2
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
EBA Revises Guidelines on Stress Tests of Deposit Guarantee Schemes
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
Nordea Bank and EIB Sign Agreement to Fund Green Projects in Nordics
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
ACPR Publishes Corrective Version of RUBA Taxonomy
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
