FIN-FSA Examines Capital Position of Banking Sector Amid Pandemic
FIN-FSA assessment reveals that the Finnish banking sector faced the COVID-19 pandemic with strong capital buffers. The capital ratios of the banking sector—that is, the ratio of own funds to total risk exposure—weakened in early 2020, due in particular to strong volatility in market prices. However, the decisions taken in Spring to lower the additional capital requirements, with the purpose of ensuring lending capacity, increased the surplus of own funds in the banking sector. The macro-prudential decisions increased the imputed lending capacity of the banking sector to Finnish businesses and households by nearly EUR 30 billion.
The capital ratios of the banking sector declined in the first quarter of 2020 compared with the situation at the end of 2019. At the end of March, the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio was 16.8% (December 31, 2019: 17.6%) and the total capital ratio was 20.2% (December 31, 2019: 21.3%). The weakening of capital ratios reflected, in particular, strong volatility in market prices at the end of March, which increased the risk-weighted assets for market risk and decreased the amount of own funds, due to negative value changes in financial assets measured at fair value. Capital ratios were also weakened by changes to the definitions used for the purpose of calculating own funds requirements (application of the definition of default in accordance with the new EBA Guidelines) by some of the banks.
In March, ECB allowed the directly supervised banks with a flexibility in the fulfillment of certain additional capital and liquidity requirements, due to the exceptional situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The measures announced in the decision supported banks’ ability to provide credit to the real economy. The measures provided by ECB are for the most part available also to banks directly supervised by FIN-FSA, if necessary. ECB and FIN-FSA also issued a recommendation to banks to refrain from dividend distribution until October 01, 2020. The FIN-FSA Board also decided to lower the additional capital requirements that are within the scope of national decision-making. These decisions removed the systemic risk buffer of Finnish credit institutions. The FIN-FSA Board also decided to lower the additional capital requirement for other systemically important institutions (the O-SII buffer) in the case of OP Financial Group. The Finnish banking sector’s additional capital requirements were also decreased by decisions taken by other Nordic supervisors to ease the countercyclical capital buffer requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Basel, COVID-19, Own Funds, Macro-Prudential Measures, FIN-FSA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
