OSFI proposed the draft guideline B-3 that sets out OSFI expectations on sound reinsurance practices and procedures. OSFI requests comments on the proposal by August 16, 2019 and intends to release the final guideline in 2020. The final guideline will be effective on the date of its issuance in 2020. OSFI also issued an impact analysis statement on the guideline.
OSFI, in June 2018, had issued a discussion paper on a reinsurance framework and the paper included proposals to enhance and clarify the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance practices. The Annex to the letter proposing the draft guideline summarizes comments received regarding the June 2018 proposals, along with the responses of OSFI. The revisions to the guideline reflect these proposals as well as comments received in response to the discussion paper. Key changes to the guideline encourage insurers to better identify and manage risks arising from the use of reinsurance, particularly counterparty risk. Revisions also clarify the OSFI expectation that reinsurance payments flow directly to a cedant insurer in Canada and reaffirm OSFI's principles-based expectation that an insurer not cede substantially all of its risks. These changes are primarily clarifications, but may highlight the need for some insurers to adjust aspects of their reinsurance programs.
Guideline B-3 applies to all federally regulated insurers that are party to reinsurance cessions, retrocessions and, where applicable, to assumption reinsurance transactions. This guideline is complementary to, and should be read in conjunction with other OSFI guidance, including Guideline A on life insurance capital adequacy test, guideline on corporate governance, and Guideline E-17 on background checks on directors and senior management.
OSFI noted some that federally regulated insurers are making greater use of reinsurance and have larger and more concentrated exposures to reinsurers. In addition, the federally regulated insurers are not consistently interpreting and applying some of the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance risk management. Consequently, some federally regulated insurers may have more risk associated with their reinsurance programs than appropriate. Hence, the objective of the OSFI reinsurance review is to ensure that the regulatory framework for reinsurance remains effective and appropriate.
Comment Due Date: August 16, 2019
Effective Date: 2020 (expected)
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Insurance, Reinsurance, Guideline B-3, Counterparty Risk, Reinsurance Practices, OSFI
Previous ArticleAPRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEAR
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting